...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin with or without ifosfamide in nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: An Italian Sarcoma Group Trial ISG/OS-1
【24h】

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin with or without ifosfamide in nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: An Italian Sarcoma Group Trial ISG/OS-1

机译:甲氨蝶呤,顺铂和阿霉素联合或不联合异环磷酰胺在肢体非转移性骨肉瘤中的新辅助化疗:意大利肉瘤小组试验ISG / OS-1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: We compared two chemotherapy regimens that included methotrexate (MTX), cisplatin (CDP), and doxorubicin (ADM) with or without ifosfamide (IFO) in patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity. Patients and Methods: Patients age ≤ 40 years randomly received regimens with the same cumulative doses of drugs (ADM 420 mg/m 2, MTX 120 g/m 2, CDP 600 mg/m 2, and IFO 30 g/m 2) but with different durations (arm A, 44 weeks; arm B, 34 weeks). IFO was given postoperatively when pathologic response to MTX-CDP-ADM was poor (arm A) or given in the primary phase of chemotherapy with MTX-CDP-ADM (arm B). End points of the study included pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy, toxicity, and survival. Given the feasibility of accrual, the statistical plan only permitted detection of a 15% difference in 5-year overall survival (OS). Results: From April 2001 to December 2006, 246 patients were enrolled. Two hundred thirty patients (94%) underwent limb salvage surgery (arm A, 92%; arm B, 96%; P = .5). Chemotherapy-induced necrosis was good in 45% of patients (48% in arm A, 42% in arm B; P = .3). Four patients died of treatment-related toxicity (arm A, n = 1; arm B, n = 3). A significantly higher incidence of hematologic toxicity was reported in arm B. With a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 1 to 104 months), 5-year OS and event-free survival (EFS) rates were not significantly different between arm A and arm B, with OS being 73% (95% CI, 65% to 81%) in arm A and 74% (95% CI, 66% to 82%) in arm B and EFS being 64% (95% CI, 56% to 73%) in arm A and 55% (95% CI, 46% to 64%) in arm B. Conclusion: IFO added to MTX, CDP, and ADM from the preoperative phase does not improve the good responder rate and increases hematologic toxicity. IFO should only be considered in patients who have a poor histologic response to MTX, CDP, and ADM.
机译:目的:我们比较了肢体非转移性骨肉瘤患者中包括甲氨蝶呤(MTX),顺铂(CDP)和阿霉素(ADM)联合或不联合异环磷酰胺(IFO)的两种化疗方案。患者和方法:年龄≤40岁的患者随机接受相同累积剂量的药物治疗(ADM 420 mg / m 2,MTX 120 g / m 2,CDP 600 mg / m 2和IFO 30 g / m 2),但具有不同的持续时间(A组为44周; B组为34周)。当对MTX-CDP-ADM的病理学反应较差时,在术后给予IFO(A组),或者在MTX-CDP-ADM化疗的初级阶段给予IFO(B组)。该研究的终点包括对术前化疗的病理反应,毒性和生存率。鉴于应计的可行性,统计计划仅允许检测5年总生存期(OS)的15%差异。结果:从2001年4月到2006年12月,共招募了246例患者。 230例患者(94%)接受了肢体抢救手术(A组为92%; B组为96%; P = 0.5)。化疗引起的坏死在45%的患者中好(A组为48%,B组为42%; P = 0.3)。四名患者死于与治疗有关的毒性反应(A组,n = 1; B组,n = 3)。 B组的血液学毒性发生率显着较高。中位随访66个月(范围1至104个月),两组之间的5年OS和无事件生存率无显着差异A和B组,A组的OS为73%(95%CI,65%至81%),B组的OS为74%(95%CI,66%至82%),EFS为64%(95%CI) ,A臂为56%至73%),B臂为55%(95%CI,46%至64%)。结论:术前添加IFO到MTX,CDP和ADM中并不能改善良好的缓解率并增加血液学毒性。仅在对MTX,CDP和ADM的组织学反应较差的患者中才应考虑IFO。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号