首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Persistent overall survival benefit and no increased risk of second malignancies with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma.
【24h】

Persistent overall survival benefit and no increased risk of second malignancies with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma.

机译:在以前未经治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者中,硼替佐米-美法仑-泼尼松与美法仑-泼尼松相比,持久的总体生存获益和发生第二次恶性肿瘤的风险没有增加。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This final analysis of the phase III VISTA trial (Velcade As Initial Standard Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Assessment With Melphalan and Prednisone) was conducted to determine whether the overall survival (OS) benefit with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) versus melphalan-prednisone (MP) in patients with myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation was maintained after 5 years of follow-up and to explore the risk of second primary malignancies.In all, 682 patients received up to nine 6-week cycles of VMP or MP and were then observed every 12 weeks or less. Data on second primary malignancies were collected by individual patient inquiries at all sites from 655 patients.After median follow-up of 60.1 months (range, 0 to 74 months), there was a 31% reduced risk of death with VMP versus MP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.695; P < .001; median OS 56.4 v 43.1 months). OS benefit with VMP was seen across prespecified patient subgroups (age ≥ 75 years, stage III myeloma, creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min). Sixty-three percent of VMP patients and 73% of MP patients had received subsequent therapy. Time to next therapy (median, 30.7 v 20.5 months; HR, 0.557; P < .001) was longer with VMP than with MP. Among patients who received subsequent therapies, survival from start of subsequent therapy was similar following VMP (median, 28.1 months) or MP (median, 26.8 months; HR, 0.914). Following VMP/MP, incidence proportions of hematologic malignancies (1%/1%) and solid tumors (5%/3%) and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (0.017/0.013 per patient-year) were similar and were consistent with background rates.VMP resulted in a significant reduction in risk of death versus MP that was maintained after 5 years' follow-up and despite substantial use of novel-agent-based salvage therapies. There is no emerging safety signal for second primary malignancies following VMP.
机译:进行了III期VISTA试验的最终分析(Velcade作为多发性骨髓瘤的初始标准疗法:用美法仑和泼尼松进行评估),以确定硼替佐米-美法仑-泼尼松(VMP)与美法仑-泼尼松对整体生存(OS)的益处随访5年后,对不适合移植的骨髓瘤患者(MP)进行维持治疗,以探讨发生第二原发性恶性肿瘤的风险。总共682例患者接受了9个为期6周的VMP或MP周期治疗,然后每12周或更短的时间观察一次。通过在655例患者中的所有患者个人询问收集到的第二原发性恶性肿瘤数据。中位随访60.1个月(范围从0到74个月)后,VMP与MP相比,死亡风险降低了31%(危险比率[HR],0.695; P <0.001;中位OS 56.4 v 43.1个月)。在预定的患者亚组(年龄≥75岁,III期骨髓瘤,肌酐清除率<60 mL / min)中观察到了VMP的OS获益。百分之六十三的VMP患者和百分之七十三的MP患者接受了后续治疗。 VMP的下一次治疗时间(中位数为30.7 v 20.5个月; HR为0.557; P <.001)比MP更长。在接受后续治疗的患者中,VMP(中位28.1个月)或MP(中位26.8个月; HR,0.914)后,从开始后续治疗的存活率相似。 VMP / MP后,血液系统恶性肿瘤(1%/ 1%)和实体瘤(5%/ 3%)的发生率和暴露调整后的发生率(每患者每年0.017 / 0.013)相似,并且与背景发生率一致与MP相比,.VMP导致死亡风险显着降低,尽管进行了5年的随访,尽管大量使用了基于新药物的抢救疗法,但MP仍使MPMP死亡。对于VMP之后的第二原发恶性肿瘤,没有新出现的安全信号。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号