首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Association of a full-day vs part-day preschool Interventionwith school readiness, attendance, and parent involvement
【24h】

Association of a full-day vs part-day preschool Interventionwith school readiness, attendance, and parent involvement

机译:全日制与半日制学前干预与上学准备,出勤和家长参与的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IMPORTANCE Early childhood interventions have demonstrated positive effects on well-being. Whether full-day vs part-day attendance improves outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between a full- vs part-day early childhood program and school readiness, attendance, and parent involvement. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS End-of-preschool follow-up of a nonrandomized, matched-group cohort of predominantly low-income, ethnic minority children enrolled in the Child-Parent Centers (CPC) for the full day (7 hours; n = 409) or part day (3 hours on average; n = 573) in the 2012-2013 school year in 11 schools in Chicago, Illinois. INTERVENTION The Midwest CPC Education Program provides comprehensive instruction, family-support, and health services from preschool to third grade. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES School readiness skills at the end of preschool, attendance and chronic absences, and parental involvement. The readiness domains in the Teaching Strategies GOLD Assessment System include a total of 49 items with a score range of 105-418. The specific domains are socioemotional with 9 items (score range, 20-81), language with 6 items (score range, 15-54), literacy with 12 items (score range, 9-104), math with 7 items (score, 8-60), physical health with 5 items (score range, 14-45), and cognitive development with 10 items (score range, 18-90). RESULTS Full-day preschool participants had higher scores than part-day peers on socioemotional development (58.6 vs 54.5; difference, 4.1; 95%CI, 0.5-7.6; P = .03), language (39.9 vs 37.3; difference, 2.6; 95%CI, 0.6-4.6; P = .01), math (40.0 vs 36.4; difference, 3.6; 95%CI, 0.5-6.7; P = .02), physical health (35.5 vs 33.6; difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.5-3.2; P = .006), and the total score (298.1 vs 278.2; difference, 19.9; 95%CI, 1.2-38.4; P = .04). Literacy (64.5 vs 58.6; difference, 5.9; 95%CI, ?0.07 to 12.4; P = .08) and cognitive development (59.7 vs 57.7; difference, 2.0; 95%CI, ?2.4 to 6.3; P = .38) were not significant. Full-day preschool graduates also had higher rates of attendance (85.9%vs 80.4%; difference, 5.5; 95%CI, 2.6-8.4; P = .001) and lower rates of chronic absences (-10% days missed; 53.0%vs 71.6%; difference, ?18.6; 95%CI, ?28.5 to ?8.7; P = .001;-20%days missed; 21.2%vs 38.8%; difference ?17.6%; 95%CI, ?25.6 to ?9.7; P < .001) but no differences in parental involvement. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In an expansion of the CPCs in Chicago, a full-day preschool intervention was associated with increased school readiness skills in 4 of 6 domains, attendance, and reduced chronic absences compared with a part-day program. These findings should be replicated in other programs and contexts.
机译:重要信息幼儿干预措施已显示出对幸福感的积极影响。全日制与半日制的出勤能否改善结果尚不清楚。目的评估全日制与半日制幼儿计划与上学准备,出勤和父母参与之间的关联。设计,地点和参加者整个非全日制,以低收入,少数族裔儿童为对象的配对组队列的学龄前随访,全天(7小时; n = 409)或2012-2013学年在伊利诺伊州芝加哥的11所学校的半日制(平均3个小时; n = 573)。干预中西部CPC教育计划提供从学龄前到三年级的全面指导,家庭支持和保健服务。主要成果和措施学前班结束时的入学准备能力,出勤和长期缺勤以及父母的参与。教学策略金牌评估系统中的准备范围包括49项,得分范围为105-418。具体领域包括:社会情感性9项(得分范围20-81),语言6项(得分范围15-54),读写能力12项(得分9-104),数学7项(得分, 8-60分),身体健康5分(分数范围14-45)和认知发育10分(分数范围18-90)。结果全日制学龄前儿童在社交情感发展方面的得分高于全日制同龄人(58.6 vs 54.5;差异为4.1; 95%CI为0.5-7.6; P = .03),语言(39.9 vs 37.3;差异为2.6;平均分)。 95%CI,0.6-4.6; P = .01),数学(40.0 vs 36.4;差异3.6; 95%CI,0.5-6.7; P = .02),身体健康(35.5 vs 33.6;差异1.9; 95) %CI,0.5-3.2; P = .006),以及总分(298.1 vs 278.2;差异为19.9; 95%CI为1.2-38.4; P = .04)。识字率(64.5 vs 58.6;差异5.9; 95%CI,?0.07至12.4; P = .08)和认知发展(59.7 vs 57.7;差异,2.0; 95%CI,?2.4至6.3; P = .38)不重要。全日制学前班毕业生的出勤率也更高(85.9%vs 80.4%;差异5.5; 95%CI,2.6-8.4; P = .001)和长期缺勤率较低(-10%缺勤天数; 53.0%)对比71.6%;差异为18.6; 95%CI为28.5至8.7; P = 0.001;缺勤天数为2%; 21.2%vs 38.8%;差异17.6%; 95%CI为25.6%,25.6至9.7 ; P <.001),但父母的参与程度没有差异。结论和相关性与芝加哥的全日制学前教育相比,全日制学前干预与6个方面中的4个领域的入学准备技能提高,出勤率和与半日制计划相比减少了长期缺勤率。这些发现应在其他程序和环境中重复使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号