首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Public health implications of government spending reductions.
【24h】

Public health implications of government spending reductions.

机译:减少政府支出对公共卫生的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Across the United States, concerns over bud-get deficits and a weak economy have prompted federal, state, and local governments to propose controversial spending reductions to balance their budgets. Debates and protests incited by these decisions dominate the news, but what is their relevance to medicine? The reflexive answer might be that government spending policies are relevant if they compromise health care services, essential public health programs, or biomedical research. However, the biggest threat to public health may come from funding cuts outside the health sector. Namely, budget decisions that affect basic living conditions-removing opportunities for education, employment, food security, and stable neighborhoods-could arguably have greater disease significance than disruptions in health care.
机译:在整个美国,对预算赤字和经济疲软的担忧促使联邦,州和地方政府提出有争议的削减开支的建议,以平衡预算。这些决定引发的辩论和抗议活动占据了新闻的主导地位,但是它们与医学的关系又是什么呢?反省的答案可能是,如果政府支出政策损害了医疗服务,基本公共卫生计划或生物医学研究,那么它们是相关的。但是,对公共卫生的最大威胁可能来自卫生部门外部的资金削减。就是说,影响基本生活条件的预算决定(为教育,就业,粮食安全和稳定的社区搬迁机会)可以说具有比破坏卫生保健更大的疾病意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号