...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation Proceedings >Effects of Two Different Techniques of Postoperative Analgesia Management in Liver Transplant Donors: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
【24h】

Effects of Two Different Techniques of Postoperative Analgesia Management in Liver Transplant Donors: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

机译:两种不同技术对肝移植供体术后镇痛的影响:一项前瞻性,随机,双盲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was the compare the donor patients who received intravenous (IV) morphine with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or epidural morphine during the early postoperative period who underwent liver transplantation. Forty patients were included in the study and randomly divided into 2 groups in a double-blinded manner. They were given IV morphine 5 mg (Group C), or epidural anesthesia adding morphine (2 mg; Group E) by epidural anesthesia technique starting 15 minutes before the estimated time of completion of surgery. All of the patients received PCA with IV morphine (Group C; PCA device was set to deliver 1 mg morphine with a lockout of 15 minutes and a 4-hour limit of 20 mg, and no continuous infusion) or epidural morphine (Group E; patient-controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA] device was set to deliver 0.5 mg morphine with a lockout of 30 minutes and a 4-hour limit of 10 mg, and no continuous infusion) and were followed up for 24 hours, and pain scores were evaluated by study nurses who were blinded to the study protocol. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest and at movement and morphine consumption at 12 and 24 hours after operation evaluation time points were significantly higher in Group E than those in Group C (P < .05). Furthermore, total morphine consumption in Group C was significantly higher than that in Group E (P < .05). Epidural morphine via PCEA was associated with decreased postoperative VAS scores and morphine consumption. These findings may be beneficial for managing postoperative analgesia protocols in liver transplant donor patients.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较在术后早期接受静脉内(IV)吗啡与患者自控镇痛(PCA)或硬膜外吗啡的供体患者,这些患者接受了肝移植。 40名患者被纳入研究,并以双盲方式随机分为2组。在估计手术时间之前15分钟,通过硬膜外麻醉技术给他们静脉注射吗啡5 mg(C组)或硬膜外麻醉加吗啡(2 mg; E组)。所有患者均接受含静脉吗啡的PCA(C组; PCA装置设定为递送1 mg吗啡,锁定时间为15分钟,限制4小时为20 mg,无连续输注)或硬膜外吗啡(E组;硬膜外吗啡)。病人自控硬膜外镇痛[PCEA]装置设置为提供0.5 mg吗啡,锁定时间为30分钟,限制4小时为10 mg,无连续输注),并随访24小时,并评估疼痛评分由对研究方案不知情的研究护士。 E组的静息,运动,吗啡消耗量的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分在手术评估时间点后显着高于C组(P <0.05)。此外,C组的吗啡总消费量显着高于E组(P <.05)。经PCEA硬膜外注射吗啡与术后VAS评分降低和吗啡消耗量相关。这些发现可能有助于管理肝移植供体患者的术后镇痛方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号