...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation Proceedings >Invasive Candida infections in low risk liver transplant patients given no antifungal prophylaxis in the post-operative period
【24h】

Invasive Candida infections in low risk liver transplant patients given no antifungal prophylaxis in the post-operative period

机译:低风险肝移植患者术后未进行抗真菌预防的侵袭性念珠菌感染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In recent years the incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in post liver transplant (LT) has reduced to about 5%, however the majority of IFIs develops early in the post-transplant course. Candida species are the most frequent causative pathogens followed by Aspergillus species. Mortality for invasive candidiasis is still 40-50%. For this reason universal prophylaxis is still considered useful and is adopted by different LT centers, although it is not justified by available data. The aim of study is to evaluate Candida infection incidence and mortality in low risk patients and therefore not subjected to antifungal prophylaxis in the immediate post-LT.Methods The patient is defined low risk if without any risk factor for IFIs as reported in literature and according to our center protocol described below. We analyzed retrospectively the records (with 90 days follow-up) of all adult patients underwent to LT at our center in 2011-2012.Results At our center between 2011 and 2012, 247 LT in 232 adult patients were performed: 137 patients (59%) received prophylaxis with Amphotericin B lipid complex or liposomal Amphotericin B, 95 patients (41%) didn't receive any prophylaxis. In these latter patients was observed only one case of Candida oesophagitis at the second month post-LT. The incidence of invasive candidiasis was 0%, and there wasn't mortality ascribed to Candida infection.Conclusions It is possible to identify low risk patients for IFIs post-LT and the no prophylaxis policy in the early LT course appears safe and feasible.
机译:背景技术近年来,肝移植后(LT)的侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)的发生率已降至5%左右,但是大多数IFI在移植后的早期发展。念珠菌是最常见的致病菌,其次是曲霉菌。浸润性念珠菌病的死亡率仍为40-50%。由于这个原因,普遍预防仍然被认为是有用的,尽管没有现有数据证明其合理性,但仍被不同的LT中心采用。该研究的目的是评估低危患者的念珠菌感染发生率和死亡率,因此在LT后即刻未接受抗真菌药物的预防。方法如文献中所述,如果没有任何IFI危险因素,则将患者定义为低危患者。如下所述的我们的中心协议。我们回顾性分析了2011-2012年在我中心接受LT治疗的所有成年患者的记录(随访90天)。结果在2011年至2012年间,我们中心对232名成年患者进行了247例LT:137例患者(59例%)接受了两性霉素B脂质复合物或脂质体两性霉素B的预防,95例患者(41%)没有接受任何预防。在这些后者的患者中,LT后第二个月仅观察到一例念珠菌性食管炎。侵袭性念珠菌病的发生率为0%,没有因念珠菌感染引起的死亡。结论结论可以确定LT后IFI的低危患者,并且在LT早期过程中不采取预防措施似乎是安全可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号