首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >PRLOG should support proposal
【24h】

PRLOG should support proposal

机译:PRLOG应该支持提案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I would like to add my voice to those colleagues who have expressed concern that,under the new arrangements for the General Pharmaceutical Council,non-practising pharmacists such as myself,will no longer be able to call themselves pharmacists.Like Michael D.Moore(PJ,31 January 2009,p106),I do not take kindly to being prohibited from calling myself a pharmacist after over 58 years in the profession.In his letter,Tony Cartwright(PJ,24 January 2009,p72)sets out a simple and practical solution to the problem.That is,for the GPhC(like the General Medical Council)to distinguish between registration with the regulatory body and a licence to practise.
机译:我想向那些表达了担忧的同事们表达自己的声音,他们担心在通用制药理事会的新安排下,像我这样的非执业药师将不再能称自己为药师。就像迈克尔·D·摩尔(Michael D.Moore( (PJ,2009年1月31日,p106),我并没有被禁止从事超过58年的职业后自称药剂师。托尼·卡特赖特(Pony,2009年1月24日,p72)阐述了一个简单而又该问题的实际解决方案。也就是说,GPhC(例如,General Medical Council)要区分在监管机构的注册和执业许可证之间的区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号