首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >The Council may not like it,but Lord Hunt is right
【24h】

The Council may not like it,but Lord Hunt is right

机译:理事会可能不喜欢它,但是亨特勋爵是对的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I was intrigued to read your leading article,"Engage the silent majority"(PJ,26 May,p596),in which you claim that Lord Hunt has achieved something that no one else has done in living memory:he has united the profession.Read on and the point is made that the "silent majority"has not spoken and needs to be asked.So is your claim perhaps misleading?The truth is that Lord Hunt has managed to unite the pharmacy "establishment"(Officers and members of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Council)against what they are calling Government "interference"- hardly a uniting of the profession as you suggest.Most member's might be happy with Lord Hunt's sensible approach;The Journal just does not know.
机译:我很感兴趣阅读您的主要文章“争取沉默的多数”(PJ,5月26日,p596),其中您声称亨特勋爵在生活记忆中取得了其他人没有做过的事情:他团结了这一专业。请继续阅读,并指出“沉默的多数”没有被说出来,需要提出。那么您的主张也许会引起误解?事实是,亨特勋爵已经设法将药房的“机构”团结在一起(皇家制药协会理事会(Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Council)反对政府所谓的“干涉”-几乎不像您所建议的那样联合起来。大多数成员可能对亨德勋爵的明智做法感到满意;《华尔街日报》只是不知道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号