首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >A question for Parliament
【24h】

A question for Parliament

机译:给国会的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Last week,TheTimes carried an investigation into the funding of lobbyists behind a number of parliamentary groups.The All-Party Pharmacy Group works closely with lobbying company Luther Pendragon,which is jointly supported by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society,the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee,the Company Chemists Association and the National Pharmacy Association,and came under scrutiny by TheTimes(p64).The investigation suggested that Luther Pendragon wrote many of the APPG's reports and,consequently,the APPG was unduly influenced by pharmacy.
机译:上周,《泰晤士报》对许多议会团体背后的游说者的资金进行了调查。全党药房集团与游说公司Luther Pendragon密切合作,该公司由皇家制药协会,药物服务谈判委员会,公司化学家协会和国家药房协会都受到了《泰晤士报》的审查(第64页)。调查表明,路德·潘德拉贡撰写了许多APPG的报告,因此,APPG受到药房的不当影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号