首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:妇女团体练习参与式学习和行动以改善资源贫乏地区的孕产妇和新生儿健康:系统的回顾和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Summary Background Maternal and neonatal mortality rates remain high in many low-income and middle-income countries. Different approaches for the improvement of birth outcomes have been used in community-based interventions, with heterogeneous effects on survival. We assessed the effects of women's groups practising participatory learning and action, compared with usual care, on birth outcomes in low-resource settings. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials undertaken in Bangladesh, India, Malawi, and Nepal in which the effects of women's groups practising participatory learning and action were assessed to identify population-level predictors of effect on maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, and stillbirths. We also reviewed the cost-effectiveness of the women's group intervention and estimated its potential effect at scale in Countdown countries. Findings Seven trials (119428 births) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses of all trials showed that exposure to women's groups was associated with a 37% reduction in maternal mortality (odds ratio 0 ? 63, 95% CI 0 ? 32-0 ? 94), a 23% reduction in neonatal mortality (0-77, 0-65-0-90), and a 9% non-significant reduction in stillbirths (0-91, 0 ? 79-1 ? 03), with high heterogeneity for maternal (#=58 ? 8%, p=0 ? 024) and neonatal results (J2=64 ? 7%, p=0 ? 009). In the meta-regression analyses, the proportion of pregnant women in groups was linearly associated with reduction in both maternal and neonatal mortality (p=0 ? 026 and p=0 ? 011, respectively). A subgroup analysis of the four studies in which at least 30% of pregnant women participated in groups showed a 55% reduction in maternal mortality (0-45, 0 ? 17-0 ? 73) and a 33% reduction in neonatal mortality (0 ? 67, 0 ? 59-0 ? 74). The intervention was cost effective by WHO standards and could save an estimated 283 000 newborn infants and 41100 mothers per year if implemented in rural areas of 74 Countdown countries.
机译:背景技术在许多低收入和中等收入国家,孕产妇和新生儿死亡率仍然很高。在基于社区的干预措施中,已经采用了不同的方法来改善出生结局,这对生存率产生了不同的影响。我们评估了与平常照料相比,参与式学习和行动的妇女团体对资源贫乏地区的出生结局的影响。方法我们对在孟加拉国,印度,马拉维和尼泊尔进行的随机对照试验进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,其中评估了参与式学习和行动的妇女团体的影响,以鉴定对孕产妇死亡率影响的人群水平预测因素,新生儿死亡率和死产。我们还回顾了妇女团体干预的成本效益,并估计了其在倒计时国家中的潜在影响。结果七项试验(119428例出生)符合纳入标准。所有试验的荟萃分析表明,接触女性人群可使孕产妇死亡率降低37%(几率0到63,95%CI 0到32-0到94),新生儿死亡率降低23%(0 -77,0-65-0-90),死产减少9%(0-91,0?79-1?03),孕产妇异质性较高(#= 58?8%,p = 0 = 024)和新生儿结果(J2 = 64 = 7%,p = 0 = 009)。在荟萃回归分析中,各组中孕妇的比例与孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的降低呈线性相关(分别为p = 0?026和p = 0?011)。对四项研究的亚组分析表明,至少有30%的孕妇参加了这些研究,表明孕产妇死亡率降低了55%(0-45,0?17-0?73),新生儿死亡率降低了33%(0 ?67,0?59-0?74)。按照世卫组织的标准,该干预措施具有成本效益,如果在74个倒计时国家的农村地区实施,则估计每年可以挽救283 000婴儿和41 100母亲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号