...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial
【24h】

Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial

机译:计算机断层扫描结肠造影与钡剂灌肠对有症状患​​者大肠癌或大息肉的诊断(SIGGAR):一项多中心随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Summary Background Barium enema (BE) is widely available for diagnosis of colorectal cancer despite concerns about its accuracy and acceptability. Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) might be a more sensitive and acceptable alternative. We aimed to compare CTC and BE for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients in clinical practice.Methods This pragmatic multicentre randomised trial recruited patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer from 21 UK hospitals. Eligible patients were aged 55 years or older and regarded by their referring clinician as suitable for radiological investigation of the colon. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to BE or CTC by computer-generated random numbers, in blocks of six, stratified by trial centre and sex. We analysed the primary outcome— diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large (>10 mm) polyps—by intention to treat. The trial is an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number 95152621.Findings 3838 patients were randomly assigned to receive either BE (n=2553) or CTC (n=1285). 34 patients withdrew consent, leaving for analysis 2527 assigned to BE and 1277 assigned to CTC. The detection rate of colorectal cancer or large polyps was significantly higher in patients assigned to CTC than in those assigned to BE (93 [7 ? 3%] of 1277 vs 141 [5-6%] of 2527, relative risk 1-31, 95% CI1- 01-1 -68; p=0-0390). CTC missed three of 45 colorectal cancers and BE missed 12 of 85. The rate of additional colonic investigation was higher after CTC than after BE (283 [23 ? 5%] of 1206 CTC patients had additional investigation vs 422 [18 ? 3%] of 2300 BE patients; p=0 ? 0003), due mainly to a higher polyp detection rate. Serious adverse events were rare.Interpretation CTC is a more sensitive test than BE. Our results suggest that CTC should be the preferred radiological test for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer. Funding NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme, Cancer Research UK, EPSRC Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare, and NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care.
机译:背景技术尽管人们担心钡灌肠(BE)的准确性和可接受性,但它仍广泛用于诊断大肠癌。计算机断层扫描结肠成像(CTC)可能是更敏感和可接受的替代方法。我们旨在比较CTC和BE在临床实践中对有症状患​​者的大肠息肉或大息肉的诊断。方法该实用性多中心随机试验从英国21家医院招募了具有大肠癌症状的患者。符合条件的患者年龄为55岁或以上,并由其转诊临床医生认为适合进行结肠放射学检查。通过计算机生成的随机数将患者随机分为(2:1)BE或CTC,每组六个,按试验中心和性别分层。我们通过治疗意图分析了主要结局-诊断为大肠癌或大(> 10 mm)息肉。该试验是一项国际标准随机对照试验,编号95152621.发现3838例患者被随机分配接受BE(n = 2553)或CTC(n = 1285)。 34例患者撤回了同意书,将2527例分配给BE,1277例分配给CTC进行分析。分配给CTC的患者的结直肠癌或大息肉的检出率明显高于分配给BE的患者(1277年的93 [7?3%]比2527年的141 [5-6%],相对危险度为1-31, 95%CI1- 01-1 -68; p = 0-0390)。 CTC遗漏了45个大肠癌中的三个,BE遗漏了85个中的12个。CTC之后的额外结肠检查率比BE后更高(1206例CTC患者中的283个[23?5%]患者进行了额外检查,而422个[18?3%] 2300名BE患者; p = 0?0003),主要是由于息肉检出率更高。严重的不良事件很少见。解释CTC比BE更敏感。我们的结果表明,对于有提示大肠癌症状的患者,CTC应该是首选的放射学检查。资助NIHR健康技术评估计划,NIHR生物医学研究中心资助计划,英国癌症研究,医疗保健技术中心EPSRC多学科评估以及NIHR在应用健康研究和护理领域的领导力合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号