...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles.
【24h】

A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles.

机译:胎儿体重和出生体重百分比的全球参考。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Definition of small for gestational age in various populations worldwide remains a challenge. References based on birthweight are deficient for preterm births, those derived from ultrasound estimates might not be applicable to all populations, and the individualised reference can be too complex to use in developing countries. Our aim was to create a generic reference for fetal weight and birthweight that overcame these deficiencies and could be readily adapted to local populations. METHODS: We used the fetal-weight reference developed by Hadlock and colleagues and the notion of proportionality proposed by Gardosi and colleagues and made the weight reference easily adjustable according to the mean birthweight at 40 weeks of gestation for any local population. For application and validation, we used data from 24 countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia that participated in the 2004-08 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health (237,025 births). We compared our reference with that of Hadlock and colleagues (non-customised) and with that of Gardosi and colleagues (individualised). For every reference, the odds ratio (OR) of adverse perinatal outcomes (stillbirths, neonatal deaths, referral to higher-level or special care unit, or Apgar score lower than 7 at 5 min) for infants who were small for gestational age versus those who were not was estimated with multilevel logistic regression. FINDINGS: OR of adverse outcomes for infants small for gestational age versus those not small for gestational age was 1.59 (95% CI 1.53-1.66) for the non-customised fetal-weight reference compared with 2.87 (2.73-3.01) for our country-specific reference, and 2.84 (2.71-2.99) for the fully individualised reference. INTERPRETATION: Our generic reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles can be easily adapted to local populations. It has a better ability to predict adverse perinatal outcomes than has the non-customised fetal-weight reference, and is simpler to use than the individualised reference without loss of predictive ability. FUNDING: None.
机译:背景:在全世界各个人群中,为胎龄定义小号仍然是一个挑战。基于出生体重的参考文献不足以进行早产,根据超声估计得出的参考文献可能并不适用于所有人群,而且个性化参考文献可能过于复杂而无法在发展中国家使用。我们的目标是为胎儿体重和出生体重创建一个通用的参考文献,以克服这些缺陷并使其易于适应当地人群。方法:我们使用了Hadlock及其同事开发的胎儿体重参考标准以及Gardosi及其同事提出的比例概念,并使体重参考标准易于根据任何本地人口在妊娠40周时的平均出生体重进行调整。为了进行应用和验证,我们使用了来自非洲,拉丁美洲和亚洲的24个国家的数据,这些国家参加了2004-08年的WHO世界孕产妇和围产期健康全球调查(237,025例出生)。我们将我们的参考与Hadlock和同事(非定制)以及与Gardosi和同事(个人)的参考进行了比较。对于每个参考,对于胎龄较小的婴儿,其围产期不良结局(死产,新生儿死亡,转诊至较高级别或特殊护理部门或Apgar评分在5分钟时低于7)的比值比(OR)谁没有被估计多层次逻辑回归。研究结果:非定制胎儿体重参考的胎龄较小与胎龄不小的婴儿的不良结局为1.59(95%CI 1.53-1.66),而我国为2.87(2.73-3.01),具体参考,而完全个性化参考则为2.84(2.71-2.99)。解释:我们对胎儿体重和出生体重百分位数的通用参考可以很容易地适应当地人口。与非定制的胎儿体重参考相比,它具有更好的预测围产期不良结局的能力,并且比个性化参考更易于使用而不会丧失预测能力。资金:无。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号