...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis.
【24h】

Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis.

机译:主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术在子宫内膜癌中的生存效果(SEPAL研究):一项回顾性队列分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: In response to findings that pelvic lymphadenectomy does not have any therapeutic benefit for endometrial cancer, we aimed to establish whether complete, systematic lymphadenectomy, including the para-aortic lymph nodes, should be part of surgical therapy for patients at intermediate and high risk of recurrence. METHODS: We selected 671 patients with endometrial carcinoma who had been treated with complete, systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=325 patients) or combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=346) at two tertiary centres in Japan (January, 1986-June, 2004). Patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence were offered adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. FINDINGS: Overall survival was significantly longer in the pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy group than in the pelvic lymphadenectomy group (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.76; p=0.0005). This association was also recorded in 407 patients at intermediate or high risk (p=0.0009), but overall survival was not related to lymphadenectomy type in low-risk patients. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors showed that in patients with intermediate or high risk of recurrence, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy reduced the risk of death compared with pelvic lymphadenectomy (0.44, 0.30-0.64; p<0.0001). Analysis of 328 patients with intermediate or high risk who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy showed that patient survival improved with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (0.48, 0.29-0.83; p=0.0049) and with adjuvant chemotherapy (0.59, 0.37-1.00; p=0.0465) independently of one another. INTERPRETATION: Combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is recommended as treatment for patients with endometrial carcinoma of intermediate or high risk of recurrence. If a prospective randomised or comparative cohort study is planned to validate the therapeutic effect of lymphadenectomy, it should include both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients of intermediate or high risk of recurrence. FUNDING: Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
机译:背景:针对盆腔淋巴结清扫术对子宫内膜癌没有任何治疗益处的发现,我们旨在确定是否应该对中度和高危患者进行完整的系统性淋巴结清扫术,包括主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术复发。方法:我们选择了在日本两个三级中心接受全系统性盆腔淋巴结清扫术(n = 325例)或合并盆腔和主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术(n = 346)的671例子宫内膜癌患者(1986年1月,1986年6月) ,2004)。为中度或高复发风险的患者提供辅助放疗或化疗。主要结局指标是总体生存率。结论:盆腔和主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术组的总生存期显着长于盆腔淋巴结清扫术组(HR 0.53,95%CI 0.38-0.76; p = 0.0005)。在407例中危或高危患者中也记录了这种关联(p = 0.0009),但低危患者的总生存率与淋巴结清扫术类型无关。对预后因素的多因素分析表明,在中度或高度复发风险的患者中,盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术比盆腔淋巴结清扫术降低了死亡风险(0.44,0.30-0.64; p <0.0001)。对328例接受辅助放疗或化疗的中度或高危患者的分析表明,骨盆和主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术(0.48,0.29-0.83; p = 0.0049)和辅助化疗(0.59,0.37-1.00)改善了患者的生存率; p = 0.0465)。解释:对于中度或高复发风险的子宫内膜癌患者,建议联合盆腔和主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。如果计划进行一项前瞻性随机或对照队列研究以验证淋巴结清扫术的治疗效果,则该研究应包括中度或高复发风险的患者的盆腔和主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。资金:日本癌症多学科治疗基金会和日本科学促进会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号