...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >New international consensus on health impact assessment.
【24h】

New international consensus on health impact assessment.

机译:关于健康影响评估的新的国际共识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Gary Krieger and colleagues (June 19, p 2129) present a polarising narrative, pitting themselves, as private sector consultants, against health impact assessment (HIA) as conceptualised in the Gothenburg Consensus. Krieger and colleagues represent one perspective among HIA practitioners, who all share a commitment to the protection and enhancement of health and wellbeing. The private sector's use of HIA has not evolved independently of the public sector. Krieger and colleagues omit to note that the International Finance Corporation is a government-owned entity. Demand by governments for the accountability of financial institutions has been a driver for the private sector's use of impact assessment, including HIA. The interplay between public and private sectors has led to guidance for, and commissioning of, HIAs. Krieger and colleagues also do not acknowledge their role in writing the International Finance Corporation guidance for HIA.
机译:加里·克里格(Gary Krieger)及其同事(6月19日,第2129页)提出了一种两极分化的叙述,使自己作为私营部门顾问反对《哥德堡共识》中概念化的健康影响评估(HIA)。 Krieger及其同事代表了HIA从业者的一种观点,他们全都致力于保护和增进健康与福祉。私营部门对HIA的使用并非独立于公共部门而发展。克里格及其同事忽略指出,国际金融公司是政府所有的实体。各国政府对金融机构问责制的需求已成为推动私营部门使用影响评估(包括HIA)的驱动力。公共部门和私营部门之间的相互作用导致了HIA的指导和调试。克里格及其同事也没有承认他们在撰写国际金融公司(HIA)指南中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号