...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Interferon alfa-2a versus combination therapy with interferon alfa-2a, interleukin-2, and fluorouracil in patients with untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRC RE04/EORTC GU 30012): an open-label randomised trial.
【24h】

Interferon alfa-2a versus combination therapy with interferon alfa-2a, interleukin-2, and fluorouracil in patients with untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRC RE04/EORTC GU 30012): an open-label randomised trial.

机译:干扰素α-2a与干扰素α-2a,白介素2和氟尿嘧啶联合治疗未治疗的转移性肾细胞癌的患者(MRC RE04 / EORTC GU 30012):一项开放标签的随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma combinations of interferon alfa-2a, interleukin-2, and fluorouracil produce higher response rates and longer progression-free survival than do single agents. We aimed to compare overall survival in patients receiving combination treatment or interferon alfa-2a. METHODS: RE04/30012 was an open-label randomised trial undertaken in 50 centres across eight countries. 1006 treatment-naive patients diagnosed with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma were randomly allocated (1 to 1) by minimisation to receive interferon alfa-2a alone or combination therapy with interferon alfa-2a, interleukin-2, and fluorouracil. Treatment was not masked. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Treatment groups were compared with a non-stratified log-rank test. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 46518965. FINDINGS: 502 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alfa-2a and 504 to receive combined treatment. Median follow-up was 37.2 months (24.8-52.3). Median overall survival was 18.8 months (17.0-23.2) for patients receiving interferon alfa-2a versus 18.6 months (16.5-20.6) for those receiving combination therapy. Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% CI 0.90-1.21], p=0.55; absolute difference 0.3% (-5.1 to 5.6) at 1 year and 2.7% (-8.2 to 2.9) at 3 years). Serious adverse events were reported in 113 (23%) patients receiving interferon alfa-2a and 131 (26%) of those receiving combined treatment. INTERPRETATION: Although combination therapy does not improve overall or progression-free survival compared with interferon alfa-2a alone, immunotherapy might still have a role because it can produce remissions that are of clinically relevant length in some patients. Identification of patients who will benefit from immunotherapy is crucial. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council.
机译:背景:在转移性肾细胞癌中,干扰素α-2a,白介素2和氟尿嘧啶的组合比单一药物产生更高的应答率和更长的无进展生存期。我们旨在比较接受联合治疗或干扰素α-2a治疗的患者的总体生存率。方法:RE04 / 30012是在8个国家/地区的50个中心进行的开放标签随机试验。通过最小化将1006例初诊为晚期转移性肾细胞癌的未治疗患者随机分配(1比1)单独接受干扰素alfa-2a或与干扰素alfa-2a,白介素2和氟尿嘧啶联合治疗。治疗没有被掩盖。主要终点是总体生存率。将治疗组与非分层的对数秩检验进行比较。分析是按意向进行的。该研究已注册,编号ISRCTN46518965。结果:随机分配502例患者接受α-2a干扰素,将504例患者接受联合治疗。中位随访时间为37.2个月(24.8-52.3)。接受干扰素α-2a治疗的患者中位总生存期为18.8个月(17.0-23.2),而接受联合治疗的患者中位生存期为18.6个月(16.5-20.6)。两组的总生存率无差异(危险比1.05 [95%CI 0.90-1.21],p = 0.55; 1年绝对差值0.3%(-5.1至5.6),3年绝对差值2.7%(-8.2至2.9)年份)。据报道,接受干扰素α-2a治疗的患者有113名(23%)出现严重不良事件,而接受联合治疗的患者中有131名(26%)。解释:尽管与单独使用干扰素α-2a相比,联合治疗不能改善总体生存或无进展生存期,但免疫治疗仍可能发挥作用,因为它可以在某些患者中产生具有临床相关长度的缓解。确定将受益于免疫疗法的患者至关重要。资金来源:英国医学研究理事会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号