...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial.
【24h】

Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial.

机译:锂+丙戊酸盐联合治疗与单药治疗预防双相I型障碍(BALANCE):一项随机开放标签试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Lithium carbonate and valproate semisodium are both recommended as monotherapy for prevention of relapse in bipolar disorder, but are not individually fully effective in many patients. If combination therapy with both agents is better than monotherapy, many relapses and consequent disability could be avoided. We aimed to establish whether lithium plus valproate was better than monotherapy with either drug alone for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder. METHODS: 330 patients aged 16 years and older with bipolar I disorder from 41 sites in the UK, France, USA, and Italy were randomly allocated to open-label lithium monotherapy (plasma concentration 0.4-1.0 mmol/L, n=110), valproate monotherapy (750-1250 mg, n=110), or both agents in combination (n=110), after an active run-in of 4-8 weeks on the combination. Randomisation was by computer program, and investigators and participants were informed of treatment allocation. All outcome events were considered by the trial management team, who were masked to treatment assignment. Participants were followed up for up to 24 months. The primary outcome was initiation of new intervention for an emergent mood episode, which was compared between groups by Cox regression. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 55261332. FINDINGS: 59 (54%) of 110 people in the combination therapy group, 65 (59%) of 110 in the lithium group, and 76 (69%) of 110 in the valproate group had a primary outcome event during follow-up. Hazard ratios for the primary outcome were 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83, p=0.0023) for combination therapy versus valproate, 0.82 (0.58-1.17, p=0.27) for combination therapy versus lithium, and 0.71 (0.51-1.00, p=0.0472) for lithium versus valproate. 16 participants had serious adverse events after randomisation: seven receiving valproate monotherapy (three deaths); five lithium monotherapy (two deaths); and four combination therapy (one death). INTERPRETATION: For people with bipolar I disorder, for whom long-term therapy is clinically indicated, both combination therapy with lithium plus valproate and lithium monotherapy are more likely to prevent relapse than is valproate monotherapy. This benefit seems to be irrespective of baseline severity of illness and is maintained for up to 2 years. BALANCE could neither reliably confirm nor refute a benefit of combination therapy compared with lithium monotherapy. FUNDING: Stanley Medical Research Institute; Sanofi-Aventis.
机译:背景:碳酸锂和丙戊酸半钠均推荐作为单药治疗,以预防双相情感障碍的复发,但在许多患者中并不是完全有效的。如果两种药物联合治疗优于单药治疗,则可以避免许多复发和随之而来的残疾。我们旨在确定锂加丙戊酸是否比单药单独使用两种药物能更好地预防双相性I型疾病的复发。方法:将来自英国,法国,美国和意大利的41个地区的330岁,年龄在16岁及以上的双相性I障碍患者随机分配至开放标签锂单药治疗(血浆浓度0.4-1.0 mmol / L,n = 110),丙戊酸单药治疗(750-1250 mg,n = 110),或两种药物合用(n = 110),有效期为4-8周。通过计算机程序进行随机分组,并向研究者和参与者告知治疗分配。试验管理小组考虑了所有结局事件,而掩盖了治疗任务。对参与者进行了长达24个月的随访。主要结果是针对突发情绪发作采取了新的干预措施,并通过Cox回归比较了两组之间的差异。分析是按意向进行的。该研究的注册号为ISRCTN55261332。结果:联合治疗组的110人中有59人(54%),锂组的110人中有65人(59%),丙戊酸盐组的110人中有76人(69%)有随访期间的主要结果事件。丙戊酸与丙戊酸盐联合治疗的主要结局危险比为0.59(95%CI 0.42-0.83,p = 0.0023),锂与锂联合治疗的危险比为0.82(0.58-1.17,p = 0.27)和0.71(0.51-1.00,p锂对丙戊酸盐= = 0.0472)。随机分组后有16名参与者出现了严重的不良事件:七名接受丙戊酸盐单一疗法(三例死亡);三名接受丙戊酸单药治疗(三例死亡)。五次锂单药治疗(两次死亡);四种联合疗法(一种死亡)。解释:对于双相性I型障碍的患者,临床上已长期治疗,与丙戊酸单药相比,锂加丙戊酸联合疗法和锂单药联合治疗更有可能预防复发。该益处似乎与疾病的基线严重程度无关,并且可以维持长达2年。与锂单药相比,BALANCE不能可靠地证实或驳斥联合疗法的益处。资金来源:斯坦利医学研究所;赛诺菲-安万特。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号