首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Recurrence rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery in the prevention of recurrent pneumothoraces: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials.
【24h】

Recurrence rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery in the prevention of recurrent pneumothoraces: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials.

机译:电视胸腔镜手术与开放式手术预防复发性气胸的复发率:对随机和非随机试验的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting similar recurrence rates between video-assisted and open surgery for the treatment of recurrent pneumothorax is questionable, because the number of randomised trials is sparse and they are underpowered to detect any meaningful difference. Our aim was to do a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies to compare recurrence rates between the two forms of surgical access. METHODS: We did a systematic literature search for studies on pneumothorax surgery in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, trial registers on the internet, and conference abstracts, and identified 29 studies (four randomised and 25 non-randomised) eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis was done by combining the results of reported recurrence rates in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery compared with those having open surgery. Both fixed and random effects models were applied to the results pooled for analysis. RESULTS: In studies that did the same pleurodesis through two different forms of access, the relative risk (RR) of recurrences in patients undergoing video-assisted surgery compared with open surgery was similar between non-randomised and randomised studies (RR 4.880 [95% CI 2.670-8.922] vs 3.951 [0.858-18.193]), yielding an overall RR of 4.731 (2.699-8.291; p<0.0001). There was no evidence to suggest heterogeneity of trial results (p=0.88). The high RR of recurrence for video-assisted surgery remained robust to a random effects model (4.051 [1.996-7.465]; p<0.0001), by including all comparative studies (3.991 [2.584-6.164]; p<0.0001), with only high-quality studies used (4.016 [1.8468.736]; p<0.0001), and on a simulation biased in favour of video-assisted surgery when there were no events in either group (3.559 [2.165-5.852]; p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: Both randomised and non-randomised trials are consistent in recurrence of pneumothoraces and show a four-fold increase when a similar pleurodesis procedure is done with a video-assisted approach compared with an open approach.
机译:背景:支持电视辅助手术和开放性手术治疗复发性气胸的复发率相似的证据是可疑的,因为随机试验的数量稀少,并且无力检测任何有意义的差异。我们的目的是对随机和非随机研究进行系统评价,以比较两种形式的外科手术之间的复发率。方法:我们对Medline,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,互联网上的试验注册簿和会议摘要中有关气胸手术的研究进行了系统的文献检索,确定了29项符合纳入条件的研究(4项随机和25项非随机)。通过将接受电视胸腔镜手术的患者与进行开胸手术的患者报告的复发率结合起来,进行荟萃分析。固定效应模型和随机效应模型均应用于汇总结果以进行分析。结果:在通过两种不同形式的通路进行相同胸膜固定术的研究中,非随机研究与随机研究相比,接受电视辅助手术与开放手术的患者复发的相对风险(RR)相似(RR 4.880 [95% CI 2.670-8.922]对3.951 [0.858-18.193]),得到的总RR为4.731(2.699-8.291; p <0.0001)。没有证据表明试验结果存在异质性(p = 0.88)。通过包括所有比较研究(3.991 [2.584-6.164]; p <0.0001),仅通过电视进行的辅助手术的高复发率对随机效应模型(4.051 [1.996-7.465]; p <0.0001)仍然很稳健。使用高质量的研究(4.016 [1.8468.736]; p <0.0001),并且当两组均无事件时,模拟偏向于视频辅助手术(3.559 [2.165-5.852]; p <0.0001) 。解释:随机试验和非随机试验在气胸的复发中均一致,并且当采用类似的胸膜固定术时,采用视频辅助方法与开放性方法相比,肺气胸的复发率增加了四倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号