首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (CAIRO): a phase III randomised controlled trial.
【24h】

Sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (CAIRO): a phase III randomised controlled trial.

机译:卡培他滨,伊立替康和奥沙利铂序贯联合化疗联合治疗晚期大肠癌(CAIRO):III期随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The optimum use of cytotoxic drugs for advanced colorectal cancer has not been defined. Our aim was to investigate whether combination treatment is better than sequential administration of the same drugs in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned 820 patients with advanced colorectal cancer to receive either first-line treatment with capecitabine, second-line irinotecan, and third-line capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (sequential treatment; n=410) or first-line treatment capecitabine plus irinotecan and second-line capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (combination treatment; n=410). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT00312000. FINDINGS: 17 patients (nine in the sequential treatment group, eight in the combination group) were found to be ineligible and were excluded from the analysis. 675 (84%) patients died during the study: 336 in the sequential group and 339 in the combination group. Median overall survival was 16.3 (95% CI 14.3-18.1) months for sequential treatment and 17.4 (15.2-19.2) months for combination treatment (p=0.3281). The hazard ratio for combination versus sequential treatment was 0.92 (95% CI 0.79-1.08; p=0.3281). The frequency of grade 3-4 toxicity over all lines of treatment did not differ significantly between the two groups, except for grade 3 hand-foot syndrome, which occurred more often with sequential treatment than with combination treatment (13%vs 7%; p=0.004). INTERPRETATION: Combination treatment does not significantly improve overall survival compared with the sequential use of cytotoxic drugs in advanced colorectal cancer. Thus sequential treatment remains a valid option for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
机译:背景:尚未确定细胞毒性药物在晚期大肠癌中的最佳用途。我们的目的是研究在晚期结直肠癌患者中联合治疗是否优于顺序给药相同药物。方法:我们随机分配820名晚期大肠癌患者接受卡培他滨,二线伊立替康和三线卡培他滨加奥沙利铂一线治疗(顺序治疗; n = 410)或卡培他滨加伊立替康和一线治疗。二线卡培他滨加奥沙利铂(联合治疗; n = 410)。主要终点是总体生存率。分析是按意向进行的。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00312000。结果:发现17例患者(序贯治疗组9例,联合治疗组8例)不合格,被排除在分析之外。 675名患者(84%)在研究期间死亡:顺序组336例,联合组339例。序贯治疗的中位总生存期为16.3(95%CI 14.3-18.1)个月,联合治疗的中位总生存期为17.4(15.2-19.2)个月(p = 0.3281)。联合治疗与序贯治疗的危险比为0.92(95%CI 0.79-1.08; p = 0.3281)。两组之间所有治疗线的3-4级毒性反应的频率没有显着差异,除了3级手足综合征,顺序治疗比联合治疗更常见(13%vs 7%; p = 0.004)。解释:与顺序使用细胞毒性药物治疗晚期大肠癌相比,联合治疗不能显着提高总生存期。因此,序贯治疗仍然是晚期大肠癌患者的有效选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号