...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial.
【24h】

The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial.

机译:SANAD研究丙戊酸,拉莫三嗪或托吡酯对全身性和无法分类的癫痫的有效性:一项无盲的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Valproate is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with generalised onset seizures, and its broad spectrum of efficacy means it is recommended for patients with seizures that are difficult to classify. Lamotrigine and topiramate are also thought to possess broad spectrum activity. The SANAD study aimed to compare the longer-term effects of these drugs in patients with generalised onset seizures or seizures that are difficult to classify. METHODS: SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm B of the study recruited 716 patients for whom valproate was considered to be standard treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate between Jan 12, 1999, and Aug 31, 2004, and follow-up data were obtained up to Jan 13, 2006. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 1-year remission, and analysis was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748. FINDINGS: For time to treatment failure, valproate was significantly better than topiramate (hazard ratio 1.57 [95% CI 1.19-2.08]), but there was no significant difference between valproate and lamotrigine (1.25 [0.94-1.68]). For patients with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy, valproate was significantly better than both lamotrigine (1.55 [1.07-2.24] and topiramate (1.89 [1.32-2.70]). For time to 12-month remission valproate was significantly better than lamotrigine overall (0.76 [0.62-0.94]), and for the subgroup with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy 0.68 (0.53-0.89). But there was no significant difference between valproate and topiramate in either the analysis overall or for the subgroup with an idiopathic generalised epilepsy. INTERPRETATION: Valproate is better tolerated than topiramate and more efficacious than lamotrigine, and should remain the drug of first choice for many patients with generalised and unclassified epilepsies. However, because of known potential adverse effects of valproate during pregnancy, the benefits for seizure control in women of childbearing years should be considered.
机译:背景:丙戊酸已被广泛接受为广泛发作性癫痫患者的首选药物,其广泛的疗效意味着推荐用于难以分类的癫痫患者。拉莫三嗪和托吡酯也被认为具有广谱活性。 SANAD研究旨在比较这些药物对广泛发作或难以分类的癫痫患者的长期作用。方法:SANAD是一项在英国医院门诊的随机对照试验。该研究的B组招募了716名丙戊酸盐被视为标准治疗的患者。在1999年1月12日至2004年8月31日之间,将患者随机分为丙戊酸盐,拉莫三嗪或托吡酯,并获得直至2006年1月13日的随访数据。主要结局是治疗失败的时间和达到1的时间。缓解,并根据治疗意图和方案进行分析。该研究已注册为国际标准随机对照试验,编号为ISRCTN38354748。结论:对于失败的治疗时间,丙戊酸盐明显优于托吡酯(危险比1.57 [95%CI 1.19-2.08]),但丙戊酸盐和拉莫三嗪之间无显着差异(1.25 [0.94-1.68])。对于特发性全身性癫痫患者,丙戊酸盐显着优于拉莫三嗪(1.55 [1.07-2.24]和托吡酯(1.89 [1.32-2.70])。在12个月的缓解时间内,丙戊酸显着优于拉莫三嗪整体治疗(0.76 [ 0.62-0.94]),对于特发性全身性癫痫的亚组为0.68(0.53-0.89),但是丙戊酸和托吡酯之间的总体分析或特发性全身性癫痫的亚组之间均无显着差异。比托吡酯耐受性更好,比拉莫三嗪更有效,对于许多全身性和非分类性癫痫患者,它仍应是首选药物;但是,由于已知丙戊酸盐在怀孕期间可能产生的不良反应,因此控制分娩妇女的癫痫发作的益处应该考虑几年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号