首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir compared with that of lopinavir-ritonavir at 48 weeks in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients in TITAN: a randomised controlled phase III trial.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir compared with that of lopinavir-ritonavir at 48 weeks in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients in TITAN: a randomised controlled phase III trial.

机译:在TITAN中,经过治疗,HIV感染的患者在48周时,达那那韦-利托那韦和洛匹那韦-利托那韦的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照III期试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The protease inhibitor darunavir has been shown to be efficacious in highly treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection, but needs to be assessed in patients with a broader range of treatment experience. We did a randomised, controlled, phase III trial (TITAN) to compare 48-week efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir with that of lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced, lopinavir-naive patients. METHODS: Patients received optimised background regimen plus non-blinded treatment with darunavir-ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily or lopinavir-ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority (95% CI lower limit for the difference in treatment response -12% or greater) for HIV RNA of less than 400 copies per mL in plasma at week 48 (per-protocol analysis). TITAN (TMC114-C214) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00110877. FINDINGS: Of 595 patients randomised and treated, 187 (31%) were protease inhibitor naive; 476 of 582 (82%) were susceptible to four or more protease inhibitors. At week 48, significantly more darunavir-ritonavir than lopinavir-ritonavir patients had HIV RNA of less than 400 copies per mL (77% [220 of 286] vs 68% [199 of 293]; estimated difference 9%, 95% CI 2-16). Fewer virological failures treated with darunavir-ritonavir than with lopinavir-ritonavir developed primary protease inhibitor mutations (21% [n=6] vs 36% [n=20]) and nucleoside analogue-associated mutations (14% [n=4] vs 27% [n=15]). Safety data were generally similar between the groups; grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 80 (27%) darunavir-ritonavir and 89 (30%) lopinavir-ritonavir patients. INTERPRETATION: In lopinavir-naive, treatment-experienced patients, darunavir-ritonavir was non-inferior to lopinavir-ritonavir treatment in terms of our virological endpoint, and should therefore be considered as a treatment option for this population.
机译:背景:蛋白酶抑制剂darunavir已被证明对治疗经验丰富的HIV感染患者有效,但需要对具有广泛治疗经验的患者进行评估。我们进行了一项随机,对照的III期临床试验(TITAN),以比较darunavir-ritonavir和lopinavir-ritonavir在未经治疗,经验lopinavir的患者中的48周疗效和安全性。方法:患者接受优化的背景治疗方案,并加用darunavir-ritonavir 600/100 mg每天两次或lopinavir-ritonavir 400/100 mg每天两次的非盲治疗。主要终点是在48周时血浆中小于400拷贝/ mL的HIV RNA的非劣效性(治疗反应差异的95%CI下限为-12%或更高)(按方案分析)。 TITAN(TMC114-C214)已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00110877。结果:在595名随机和接受治疗的患者中,有187名(31%)是单纯的蛋白酶抑制剂。 582个样本中有476个(82%)对四种或更多种蛋白酶抑制剂敏感。在第48周时,HIV RNA低于每毫升400拷贝的darunavir-ritonavir患者明显多于lopinavir-ritonavir患者(77%[220 of 286]对68%[293 of 199];估计差异9%,95%CI 2 -16)。与lopinavir-ritonavir相比,使用darunavir-ritonavir治疗的病毒学失败较少,从而产生了主要的蛋白酶抑制剂突变(21%[n = 6]对36%[n = 20])和核苷类似物相关突变(14%[n = 4] vs. 27%[n = 15])。两组之间的安全性数据一般相似; 80例(27%)地那韦-利托那韦和89例(30%)洛匹那韦-利托那韦发生3或4级不良事件。解释:在未经洛匹那韦-利托那韦治疗的未接受过洛匹那韦的患者中,就我们的病毒学终点而言,达那那韦-利托那韦不逊于洛匹那韦-利托那韦的治疗,因此应被视为该人群的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号