首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Effect of budesonide in combination with formoterol for reliever therapy in asthma exacerbations: a randomised controlled, double-blind study.
【24h】

Effect of budesonide in combination with formoterol for reliever therapy in asthma exacerbations: a randomised controlled, double-blind study.

机译:布地奈德与福莫特罗联用在哮喘急性发作的缓解治疗中的作用:一项随机对照,双盲研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The contributions of as-needed inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) to asthma control have not been fully established. We compared the efficacy and safety of three reliever strategies: a traditional short-acting beta2 agonist; a rapid-onset LABA (formoterol); and a combination of LABA and an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide-formoterol) in symptomatic patients receiving budesonide-formoterol maintenance therapy. METHODS: We did a 12-month, double-blind, parallel-group study in 3394 patients (aged 12 years or older), in 289 centres in 20 countries, who were using inhaled corticosteroids at study entry and symptomatic on budesonide-formoterol (160 microg and 4.5 microg, respectively), one inhalation twice daily, during a 2-week run-in. After run-in, patients were randomly assigned budesonide-formoterol maintenance therapy plus one of three alternative as-needed medications-terbutaline (0.4 mg), formoterol (4.5 microg), or budesonide-formoterol (160 microg and 4.5 microg). The primary outcome was time to first severe exacerbation, defined as an event resulting in hospitalisation, emergency room treatment, or both, or the need for oral steroids for 3 days or more. FINDINGS: Time to first severe exacerbation was longer with as-needed budesonide-formoterol versus formoterol (p=0.0048; log-rank test) and with as-needed formoterol versus terbutaline (p=0.0051). The rate of severe exacerbations was 37, 29, and 19 per 100 patients per year with as-needed terbutaline, formoterol, and budesonide-formoterol, respectively (rate ratios budesonide-formoterol versus formoterol 0.67 [95% CI 0.56-0.80; p<0.0001]; budesonide-formoterol versus terbutaline 0.52 [0.44-0.62; p<0.0001]; formoterol versus terbutaline 0.78 [0.67-0.91; p=0.0012]). Asthma control days increased to a similar extent in all treatment groups. As-needed formoterol did not significantly improve symptoms compared with as-needed terbutaline. All treatments were well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: Both monocomponents of budesonide-formoterol given as needed contribute to enhanced protection from severe exacerbations in patients receiving combination therapy for maintenance.
机译:背景:尚未完全确定需要吸入的皮质类固醇和长效β2激动剂(LABA)对哮喘控制的作用。我们比较了三种缓解策略的功效和安全性:传统的短​​效beta2激动剂;快速发作的LABA(福莫特罗);在接受布地奈德-福莫特罗维持治疗的有症状患者中,联合使用LABA和吸入皮质类固醇(布地奈德-福莫特罗)。方法:我们在20个国家/地区的289个中心对3394名12岁或以上年龄的3394名患者进行了为期12个月的双盲平行研究,他们在研究开始时使用吸入性糖皮质激素,并有症状地使用布地奈德-福莫特罗(分别为160微克和4.5微克),在2周的磨合期间每天吸入两次。磨合后,患者被随机分配布地奈德-福莫特罗维持治疗加三种必要的替代药物特布他林(0.4 mg),福莫特罗(4.5微克)或布地奈德-福莫特罗(160微克和4.5微克)中的一种。主要结局是首次严重加重的时间,定义为导致住院,急诊室治疗或两者同时发生,或需要口服类固醇3天或更长时间的事件。结果:布地奈德-福莫特罗与福莫特罗(p = 0.0048;对数秩检验)和福美特罗与特布他林相对应(p = 0.0051)的首次严重加重时间更长。每年每100名急需的特布他林,福莫特罗和布地奈德-福莫特罗的严重加重发生率分别为37、29和19(布地奈德-福莫特罗与福莫特罗的比率:0.67 [95%CI 0.56-0.80; p < 0.0001];布地奈德-福莫特罗对特布他林0.52 [0.44-0.62; p <0.0001];福莫特罗对特布他林0.78 [0.67-0.91; p = 0.0012])。在所有治疗组中,哮喘控制天的增加幅度均相似。与所需的特布他林相比,所需的福莫特罗没有明显改善症状。所有治疗均耐受良好。解释:必要时给予布地奈德-福莫特罗的两种单组分有助于增强保护,使其在接受联合治疗以维持治疗的患者中免受严重加重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号