...
首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus medical therapy for menorrhagia
【24h】

Levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus medical therapy for menorrhagia

机译:左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与药物治疗月经过多

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Menorrhagia is a common problem, yet evidence to inform decisions about therapy is limited. In a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized trial, we compared the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (levonorgestrel-IUS) with usual medical treatment in women with menorrhagia who presented to their primary care providers. Methods: We randomly assigned 571 women with menorrhagia to treatment with levonorgestrel-IUS or usual medical treatment (tranexamic acid, mefenamic acid, combined estrogen - progestogen, or progesterone alone). The primary outcome was the patient-reported score on the Menorrhagia Multi-Attribute Scale (MMAS) (ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating greater severity), assessed over a 2-year period. Secondary outcomes included general quality-of-life and sexual-activity scores and surgical intervention. Results: MMAS scores improved from baseline to 6 months in both the levonorgestrel-IUS group and the usual-treatment group (mean increase, 32.7 and 21.4 points, respectively; P<0.001 for both comparisons). The improvements were maintained over a 2-year period but were significantly greater in the levonorgestrel-IUS group than in the usual-treatment group (mean between-group difference, 13.4 points; 95% confidence interval, 9.9 to 16.9; P<0.001). Improvements in all MMAS domains (practical difficulties, social life, family life, work and daily routine, psychological well-being, and physical health) were significantly greater in the levonorgestrel-IUS group than in the usual-treatment group, and this was also true for seven of the eight quality-of-life domains. At 2 years, more of the women were still using the levonorgestrel-IUS than were undergoing the usual medical treatment (64% vs. 38%, P<0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of surgical intervention or sexual-activity scores. There were no significant differences in serious adverse events between groups. Conclusions: In women with menorrhagia who presented to primary care providers, the levonorgestrel-IUS was more effective than usual medical treatment in reducing the effect of heavy menstrual bleeding on quality of life. (Funded by the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme; ECLIPSE Controlled-Trials.com number, ISRCTN86566246.)
机译:背景:月经过多是一个普遍的问题,但是有关治疗决策的证据有限。在一项实用,多中心,随机试验中,我们比较了向初级保健提供者就诊的月经过多妇女中的左炔诺孕酮释放子宫内系统(levonorgestest-IUS)与常规药物治疗。方法:我们随机分配571例月经过多的妇女接受左炔诺孕酮-IUS治疗或常规治疗(氨甲环酸,甲芬那酸,雌激素-孕激素联合使用或单独使用孕激素)。主要结局是患者报告的月经过多综合量表(MMAS)(范围从0到100,分数越低表示严重程度越高),在2年期间内进行了评估。次要结果包括一般生活质量和性活动评分以及手术干预。结果:左炔诺孕酮-IUS组和常规治疗组的MMAS评分均从基线提高至6个月(分别增加32.7和21.4分;两次比较均P <0.001)。改善持续了2年,但左炔诺孕酮-IUS组明显优于常规治疗组(组间平均差异13.4点; 95%置信区间9.9至16.9; P <0.001) 。左炔诺孕酮-IUS组的所有MMAS领域(实践困难,社交生活,家庭生活,工作和日常生活,心理健康和身体健康)的改善均显着大于常规治疗组,并且这也是对于8个生活质量域中的7个而言,是正确的。 2岁时,仍在使用左炔诺孕酮-IUS的妇女多于接受常规药物治疗的妇女(64%比38%,P <0.001)。两组的手术干预率或性活动评分均无显着差异。两组之间的严重不良事件没有显着差异。结论:在向初级保健提供者就诊的月经过多的女性中,左炔诺孕酮-IUS在降低月经期大出血对生活质量的影响方面比常规药物治疗更为有效。 (由美国国立卫生研究院卫生技术评估计划资助; ECLIPSE Con​​trolled-Trials.com编号ISRCTN86566246。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号