...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a randomized, controlled trial.
【24h】

Combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a randomized, controlled trial.

机译:肛周-直肠内利多卡因-普洛卡因乳膏和前列腺周围神经阻滞联合治疗经直肠超声引导下的前列腺穿刺活检期间的疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To our knowledge the optimal analgesia during prostate biopsy remains undetermined. We tested the efficacy and safety of combined perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 280 patients were randomized to receive combined perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block (group 1), perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream alone (group 2), periprostatic nerve block alone (group 3) or no anesthesia (group 4) before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Pain was evaluated with a 10-point visual analog scale at subsequent procedural steps, including perianal-intrarectal substance administration, prostate transrectal ultrasound, periprostatic nerve block and sampling. Complications were assessed by self-administered questionnaire and telephone interview. RESULTS: The groups were comparable in patient age, prostate volume, pathology results and visual analog scale perianal-intrarectal substance administration. Visual analog scale results for transrectal ultrasound were lower in groups 1 and 2 vs 3 and 4 (mean 1.5 and 1.41 vs 5.37 and 5.31, p <0.001) and results for periprostatic nerve block were lower in group 1 vs 3 (mean 1.03 vs 3.74, p <0.001). Results for sampling were lower in groups 1 to 3 vs 4 (mean 0.77, 1.27 and 1.27 vs 4.33, p <0.001) and in group 1 vs 2 and 3 (p <0.001). Stratified analysis showed that visual analog scale sampling was lower in group 1 vs 2 and 3 in patients 65 years old or younger, those with a prostate greater than 49 cc and those with lower anorectal compliance (visual analog scale results for perianal-intrarectal substance administration greater than 2) (p = 0.006, <0.001 and 0.003, respectively). The overall complication rate was similar in all 4 groups (p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block provides better pain control than the 2 modalities alone during the sampling part of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy with no increase in the complication rate. The magnitude of this effect is higher in younger men, men with a larger prostate and men with lower anorectal compliance.
机译:目的:据我们所知,前列腺穿刺活检期间的最佳镇痛作用尚未确定。我们在经直肠超声引导下的前列腺穿刺活检过程中测试了肛周-直肠内利多卡因-普罗卡因联合乳膏和前列腺周围神经阻滞的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:总共280例患者被随机分配接受联合肛周-直肠内利多卡因-普罗卡因乳膏和前列腺周围神经阻滞(第1组),肛肠-直肠内利多卡因-普洛卡因乳膏单独(第2组),单纯前列腺周围神经阻滞(第3组) )或无麻醉(第4组),然后经直肠超声引导下进行前列腺活检。在随后的手术步骤中,使用10点视觉模拟量表评估疼痛,​​包括肛周-直肠内给药,前列腺经直肠超声检查,前列腺周围神经阻滞和取样。并发症通过自我调查表和电话访谈进行评估。结果:各组在患者年龄,前列腺体积,病理结果和肛周直肠内物质的视觉模拟量表上具有可比性。直肠超声的视觉模拟量表结果在第1组和第2组与第3组和第4组相比较低(分别为1.5和1.41对5.37和5.31,p <0.001),而在前列腺周围神经阻滞的结果在第1组与第3组相比较低(平均1.03对3.74 ,p <0.001)。抽样结果在1至3组与4组之间比较低(分别为0.77、1.27和1.27与4.33对4.33,p <0.001),而在1组与2和3组之间(p <0.001)。分层分析显示,年龄在65岁或以下,前列腺大于49 cc的患者和肛门直肠顺应性较低的患者,第1组的视觉模拟量表抽样低于第2组和第3组(肛周直肠内给药的视觉模拟量表结果)大于2)(分别为p = 0.006,<0.001和0.003)。所有4组的总并发症发生率相似(p = 0.87)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的取样部分,肛周-直肠内利多卡因-普洛卡因乳膏和前列腺周围神经阻滞的结合提供了比单独的两种方式更好的疼痛控制,且并发症发生率没有增加。在较年轻的男性,前列腺较大的男性和肛门直肠顺应性较低的男性中,这种作用的程度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号