首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Comparison of laparoscopic with open approach for ureterolysis in patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis.
【24h】

Comparison of laparoscopic with open approach for ureterolysis in patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis.

机译:腹腔镜与开放式腹膜后纤维化患者输尿管溶栓的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The surgical management of retroperitoneal fibrosis has traditionally involved open ureterolysis. We compared laparoscopic and open ureterolysis to determine if the minimally invasive approach offered advantages with respect to perioperative morbidity and treatment efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our retroperitoneal fibrosis database at a single institution to identify all patients who underwent open or laparoscopic ureterolysis between 1995 and 2005. Clinical, perioperative and outcome data were prospectively collected and compared between the open and laparoscopic ureterolysis cohorts. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients with primary retroperitoneal fibrosis comparing outcomes in open and laparoscopic ureterolysis groups. RESULTS: We identified 36 (51.4%) patients who underwent open ureterolysis and 34 (48.6%) who underwent laparoscopic ureterolysis. Conversion to open surgery was required in 17.6% of the laparoscopic ureterolysis cohort. The etiology of obstruction was primary idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis in 35 (50%) patients, whereas the remainder had secondary retroperitoneal fibrosis, largely related to gynecological malignancy. There was no difference between the 2 groups when comparing operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, transfusion requirements and postoperative resolution of ureteral obstruction. Subgroup analysis limited to patients with primary idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis demonstrated that those who underwent laparoscopic ureterolysis had a shorter hospital stay (3.4 vs 10.8, p <0.001) and were less likely to require transfusion (3.7% vs 13.7%, p = 0.007) compared to patients who underwent open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ureterolysis is an excellent option for patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis of all causes with morbidity and efficacy comparable to open surgery. In patients with primary idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis laparoscopy offers the added advantages of shorter hospital stay and reduced transfusion requirements.
机译:目的:腹膜后纤维化的外科治疗传统上涉及开放性输尿管溶栓术。我们比较了腹腔镜和开放式输尿管溶解术,以确定微创方法是否在围手术期发病率和治疗效果方面提供了优势。材料与方法:我们回顾了一家机构的腹膜后纤维化数据库,以识别所有1995年至2005年接受开放或腹腔镜输尿管溶解术的患者。前瞻性收集了临床,围手术期和结局数据,并比较了开放和腹腔镜输尿管溶解术队列。对原发性腹膜后纤维化患者进行亚组分析,比较开放和腹腔镜输尿管溶解组的结局。结果:我们确定了36例(51.4%)接受了开放性输尿管溶解术的患者和34例(48.6%)进行了腹腔镜输尿管溶栓术的患者。腹腔镜输尿管溶解人群中有17.6%需要改用开腹手术。梗阻的病因是35例(50%)患者的原发性特发性腹膜后纤维化,而其余患者则患有继发性腹膜后纤维化,主要与妇科恶性肿瘤有关。在比较手术时间,估计失血量,住院时间,并发症,输血需求和输尿管梗阻的术后解决率方面,两组之间没有差异。亚组分析仅限于原发性特发性腹膜后纤维化患者,表明接受腹腔镜输尿管溶解术的患者住院时间较短(3.4 vs 10.8,p <0.001),需要输血的可能性较小(3.7%vs 13.7%,p = 0.007)接受开放手术的患者。结论:腹腔镜输尿管溶栓术是所有原因引起的腹膜后纤维化患者的最佳选择,其发病率和疗效与开放手术相当。在原发性特发性腹膜后纤维化患者中,腹腔镜检查具有住院时间短和输血需求减少的其他优点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号