【24h】

Influence of DNA Structure on Adjacent Site Cooperative Binding

机译:DNA结构对邻近位点协同结合的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous NMR studies of Hoechst 33258 with the d(CTTTTGCAAAAG)2 sequence have shown very strong (K2 K1) cooperativity between two adjacent binding sites (Searle, M. S.; Embrey, K. J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990,18 (13), 3753—3762). In contrast, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) results with the hairpin analog of the same sequence show significantly reduced cooperativity. In an effort to explain the difference, two-dimensional (2-D) NMR experiments were done on both duplex and hairpin. Hoechst 33258 and an amidine analog, DB183, show very strong cooperativity with the duplex DNA but much weaker cooperativity with the hairpin. The significantly lower thermal melting temperature (T_m) of the duplex (34.8 °C) in comparison to its hairpin analog (62.3 °C) supports the idea of a dynamic difference between the two DNA structures that can influence cooperativity in binding. These results confirm the role of conformational entropy in positive cooperativity in some DNA interactions.
机译:Hoechst 33258与d(CTTTTGCAAAAG)2序列的先前NMR研究表明,两个相邻结合位点之间具有非常强的(K2 K1)协同作用(Searle,MS; Embrey,KJ Nucleic Acids Res.1990,18(13),3753) —3762)。相反,具有相同序列的发夹类似物的表面等离振子共振(SPR)结果显示出明显降低的协同性。为了解释这种差异,在双链体和发夹上都进行了二维(2-D)NMR实验。 Hoechst 33258和an类似物DB183与双链DNA具有很强的协同作用,而与发夹的协同作用却弱得多。与发夹类似物(62.3°C)相比,双链体(34.8°C)的热解链温度(T_m)明显更低,这支持了两个DNA结构之间动态差异的想法,这可能会影响结合的协同作用。这些结果证实了构象熵在某些DNA相互作用中在正合作性中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号