首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, A. Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory >Hierarchy of relative bond dissociation enthalpies and their use to efficiently compute accurate absolute bond dissociation enthalpies for C-H, C-C, and C-F bonds
【24h】

Hierarchy of relative bond dissociation enthalpies and their use to efficiently compute accurate absolute bond dissociation enthalpies for C-H, C-C, and C-F bonds

机译:相对键解离焓的层次结构及其用于有效计算C-H,C-C和C-F键的绝对键解离焓的准确度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have used the high-level W1X-2 and G4(MP2)-6X procedures to examine the performance of a variety of computationally less demanding quantum chemistry methods for the calculation of absolute bond dissociation enthalpies (BDEs) and a hierarchy of relative bond dissociation enthalpies. These include relative bond dissociation enthalpies (RBDEs), deviations from additivity of RBDEs (DARBDEs), and deviations from pairwise additivity of RBDEs (DPARBDEs). The absolute magnitudes of these quantities decrease in the order BDE > RBDE > DARBDE > DPARBDE, and overall, theoretical procedures are better able to describe these quantities in the same order. In general, the performance of the various types of procedures improves in the order pure DFT → hybrid DFT → double-hybrid DFT → composite procedures, as expected. Overall, we find M06-L to be the best-performing pure DFT procedure and M06-2X to be the best among the hybrid DFT methods. A promising observation is that even many pure and hybrid DFT procedures give DARBDE and DPARBDE values that are reasonably accurate. This can be exploited by using reference BDEs calculated at a higher-level of theory, in combination with DARBDE or DPARBDE values obtained at a lower level, to produce BDEs and RBDEs with an accuracy that is close to the directly calculated higher-level values. Strongly π-electron-withdrawing or π-electron-donating groups, however, sometimes represent challenges to these approximation methods when the substrate contains several of these substituents.
机译:我们已经使用高级W1X-2和G4(MP2)-6X程序来检查各种计算要求较低的量子化学方法的性能,这些方法用于计算绝对键解离焓(BDE)和相对键解离的层次结构焓。这些包括相对键解离焓(RBDE),与RBDE的可加性的偏离(DARBDE)和与RBDE对的成对可加性的偏离(DPARBDE)。这些数量的绝对大小按BDE> RBDE> DARBDE> DPARBDE的顺序减小,并且总体而言,理论上的程序可以更好地以相同的顺序描述这些数量。通常,按照预期的那样,各种类型的过程的性能按纯DFT→混合DFT→双杂种DFT→复合过程的顺序改进。总的来说,在混合DFT方法中,我们发现M06-L是性能最好的纯DFT方法,而M06-2X是最好的。有希望的观察结果是,甚至许多纯DFT和混合DFT程序也提供了相当准确的DARBDE和DPARBDE值。通过使用在较高理论水平下计算的参考BDE与在较低水平下获得的DARBDE或DPARBDE值相结合,可以开发出精度接近直接计算出的较高水平值的BDE和RBDE。但是,当底物包含多个这些取代基时,强烈的π电子吸收基团或π电子给体基团有时对这些近似方法构成挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号