首页> 外文期刊>Crop Protection >Influence of air-assistance on spray application for tomato plants in greenhouses
【24h】

Influence of air-assistance on spray application for tomato plants in greenhouses

机译:空气辅助对温室番茄植株喷雾的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Protected horticulture production represents one of the most important agricultural businesses in Southern Europe. However, many problems related to the lack of mechanisation, intensive use of pesticides, and, in some cases, undesirable residues on food, have not been solved yet. In this context, application technology is a key factor for the improvement of the efficacy and efficiency of plant protection products. Spray guns and knapsack sprayers are the most common technologies that have been used for this purpose. However, several studies have demonstrated that, compared with spray guns, the use of vertical boom sprayers in greenhouses improves spray distribution and reduces labour costs and operator exposure. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of air-assistance on spray application in conventional tomato greenhouses. For this purpose three different spray conceptions were evaluated; 1) a modified commercial handheld trolley sprayer with two air assistance concepts; 2) a self-propelled sprayer; and 3) an autonomous self-propelled sprayer with remote control. All the sprayers considered were evaluated in terms of absolute and normalised canopy deposition, uniformity of distribution, and losses to the ground. In addition, the vertical liquid and air velocity distributions of the sprayers were assessed and compared with the canopy profiles and spray depositions. Yellow tartrazine (E-102 yellow) was used as a tracer for deposition evaluation. The results indicated that increasing the air velocity does not increase the efficiency of a spray application. In general, the modified handheld trolley sprayer showed the best results in terms of deposition and uniformity of distribution, especially at the lowest air assistance rate. These results were confirmed with evaluation of the uniformity of the air and liquid distribution. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:园艺生产受保护代表了南欧最重要的农业业务之一。然而,与缺乏机械化,大量使用农药以及在某些情况下食品上残留的不良残留物有关的许多问题尚未解决。在这种情况下,应用技术是提高植物保护产品功效和效率的关键因素。喷枪和背负式喷雾器是用于此目的的最常用技术。但是,一些研究表明,与喷枪相比,在温室中使用立式喷杆喷雾器可以改善喷雾分布,并降低人工成本和操作人员的负担。这项研究的主要目的是评估空气辅助对传统番茄大棚喷雾施用的影响。为此,对三种不同的喷雾概念进行了评估。 1)具有两个空气辅助概念的改进型商用手持式手推车喷雾器; 2)自动喷雾器; 3)具有遥控功能的自主式自动喷雾机。对所有考虑的喷雾器均进行了绝对和归一化的冠层沉积,分布均匀性以及地面损失方面的评估。另外,评估了喷雾器的垂直液体和空气速度分布,并将其与冠层轮廓和喷雾沉积物进行了比较。使用黄色酒石黄(E-102黄色)作为示踪剂进行沉积评估。结果表明,增加风速不会增加喷涂的效率。通常,改进的手持式手推车喷雾器在沉积和分布均匀性方面显示出最佳效果,尤其是在最低空气辅助率下。通过评估空气和液体分布的均匀性,证实了这些结果。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号