首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Antimuscarinics and α-blockers or α-blockers monotherapy on lower urinary tract symptoms - A meta-analysis
【24h】

Antimuscarinics and α-blockers or α-blockers monotherapy on lower urinary tract symptoms - A meta-analysis

机译:抗毒蕈碱药和α-阻滞剂或α-阻滞剂单一疗法治疗下尿路症状-荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To assess the clinical efficiency and safety of combination pharmacotherapy of antimuscarinics and α-blockers vs α-blockers monotherapy on patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, and Web of Science from their inception until June 2013 to identify all eligible studies that compare the 2 pharmacotherapy strategies on LUTS. The Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.2 software was used for data analysis, and the fixed or the random effect model was selected depending on the proportion of heterogeneity. Results Eighteen eligible randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review, including 2106 (51.57%) in cotherapy group and 1978 (48.43%) in monotherapy group. Synthetic data showed that there were significant improvements on Storage International Prostate Symptom Score (mean difference [MD] = -1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.10 to -0.91, P <.00001), quality of life score (MD = -0.53; 95% CI -0.89 to -0.17, P =.004), micturitions per 24 hours (MD = -1.14; 95% CI -1.84 to -0.45, P =.001), and urgency episodes per 24 hours (MD = -0.99; 95% CI -1.46 to -0.51, P <.0001) in the cotherapy group. There were no significant difference regarding maximum flow rate (MD = -0.05; 95% CI -0.27 to 0.17, P =.64), Total International Prostate Symptom Score (TIPSS) (MD = -0.88; 95% CI -1.64 to -0.12, P =.02), and Voiding International Prostate Symptom Score (VIPSS) (MD = 0.40; 95% CI -0.34 to 1.15, P =.29). As to postvoid residual volume, however, a worse condition was showed in the cotherapy group (MD = -6.53; 95% CI 3.06-10.00, P <.0002). Conclusion Antimuscarinics could and should be added to the drug regimen for patients with LUTS attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia/bladder outlet obstruction, particularly are dominated by storage symptoms. For patients with increased acute urinary retention risk, they should be carefully monitored.
机译:目的评估抗毒蕈碱药物联合α-受体阻滞剂与α-受体阻滞剂单药联合治疗中,重度下尿路症状(LUTS)的临床疗效和安全性。方法我们从2013年6月开始搜索Cochrane对照试验中央登记册,PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane系统评价数据库和Web of Science,以确定所有比较了LUTS的2种药物治疗策略的合格研究。使用Cochrane Collaboration的RevMan 5.2软件进行数据分析,并根据异质性的比例选择固定或随机效应模型。结果本系统评价包括18项合格的随机对照试验,其中共疗法组2106例(51.57%),单药疗法1978年(48.43%)。综合数据显示,国际存储前列腺症状评分(平均差异[MD] = -1.51; 95%置信区间[CI] -2.10至-0.91,P <.00001),生活质量评分(MD = -0.53; 95%CI -0.89至-0.17,P = .004),每24小时排尿次数(MD = -1.14; 95%CI -1.84至-0.45,P = .001)和每24小时尿急发作(在联合治疗组中,MD = -0.99; 95%CI -1.46至-0.51,P <.0001)。最大流速(MD = -0.05; 95%CI -0.27至0.17,P = .64),国际前列腺总症状评分(TIPSS)(MD = -0.88; 95%CI -1.64至-)无显着差异。 0.12,P = .02),以及Voiding国际前列腺症状评分(VIPSS)(MD = 0.40; 95%CI -0.34至1.15,P = .29)。至于无残留量,在联合治疗组中情况更糟(MD = -6.53; 95%CI 3.06-10.00,P <.0002)。结论对于因前列腺增生/膀胱出口梗阻(尤其是储存症状)而引起的LUTS患者,可以并且应在其药物治疗方案中添加抗毒蕈碱药物。对于急性尿retention留风险增加的患者,应仔细监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号