首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and immunologic methods for the detection of nanobacterial infection in type-III prostatitis
【24h】

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and immunologic methods for the detection of nanobacterial infection in type-III prostatitis

机译:聚合酶链反应和免疫学方法检测III型前列腺炎中纳米细菌感染的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective To compare the results of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunologic methods for the detection of nanobacteria (NB) in the expressed prostatic secretions (EPSs) of patients with type-III prostatitis. Methods In total, 150 patients with type-III prostatitis for whom conventional clinical treatment had failed were selected from September 2009 to April 2010. The EPS of each patient was divided into 3 parts, which were used for PCR analysis, indirect immunofluorescence staining (IIFS), and culture and subsequent indirect immunofluorescence staining (CIIFS). Results PCR analysis has a higher sensitivity than IIFS for the detection of NB in EPSs. Of 83 CIIFS-positive EPS samples, 79 (95.2%) were positive by PCR. Of 67 EPS samples that were negative by CIIFS, 60 (89.6%) were negative by PCR. The sensitivity of PCR for the detection of NB compared with the CIIFS method was 95.2%, with a specificity of 89.6%. The positive predictive value was 91.9%, and the negative predictive value was 93.8%. A comparative evaluation showed no statistically significant difference between PCR and CIIFS in the detection of NB in EPSs. A strong agreement in the positive and the negative results obtained by PCR and CIIFS for NB detection was found for all EPS samples. Conclusion PCR analysis has a higher sensitivity than IIFS for NB detection in type-III prostatitis. PCR can detect nanobacterial infection in type-III prostatitis equally well as CIIFS and offers significant advantages for the rapid, simple, and economical detection of nanobacterial infection in type-III prostatitis.
机译:目的比较聚合酶链反应(PCR)和免疫学方法检测III型前列腺炎患者表达的前列腺分泌物(EPS)中纳米细菌(NB)的结果。方法选择2009年9月至2010年4月共150例常规治疗失败的Ⅲ型前列腺炎患者。将每例患者的EPS分为3部分,进行PCR分析,间接免疫荧光染色(IIFS)。 ),培养以及随后的间接免疫荧光染色(CIIFS)。结果PCR分析对IIPS中NB的检测灵敏度高于IIFS。在83个CIIFS阳性EPS样本中,有79个(95.2%)通过PCR呈阳性。在通过CIIFS阴性的67个EPS样本中,有60个(89.6%)通过PCR阴性。与CIIFS方法相比,PCR检测NB的灵敏度为95.2%,特异性为89.6%。阳性预测值为91.9%,阴性预测值为93.8%。对比评估显示,PCR和CIIFS在EPS中NB的检测上没有统计学上的显着差异。对于所有EPS样品,通过PCR和CIIFS获得的用于NB检测的阳性和阴性结果都具有很强的一致性。结论PCR分析对III型前列腺炎的NB检测灵敏度高于IIFS。 PCR可以与CIIFS一样好地检测III型前列腺炎中的纳米细菌感染,并为快速,简单且经济地检测III型前列腺炎中的纳米细菌感染提供了显着优势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urology》 |2014年第3期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号