首页> 外文期刊>Physica, B. Condensed Matter >Comparative study of the empirical interatomic potentials and density-functional simulations of divacancy and hexavacancy in silicon
【24h】

Comparative study of the empirical interatomic potentials and density-functional simulations of divacancy and hexavacancy in silicon

机译:硅中空位和六空位的经验原子间电势和密度泛函模拟的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The comparison between three classical potentials and density functional theory (DFT) is performed mainly for divacancy and hexavacancy in Si crystal. According to their performances on the formation energies and structural properties (distortion magnitude, relaxation volume and symmetry), the limitations and validities of classical potentials are discussed. It is found that the outward relaxation directions of EDIP and Tersoff (T3) are contrary to the DFT and StillingerWeber (SW) directions (inward), which restrict their application in the structural property calculations. Except for the divacancy symmetries, the results of SW are in agreement with the DFT results. Thus, it can be concluded that SW should be the best potential to describe V_2 and V_6.
机译:三种经典势能与密度泛函理论(DFT)的比较主要是针对Si晶体中的空位和六空位进行的。根据它们对地层能量和结构性质(畸变幅度,弛豫体积和对称性)的性能,讨论了经典势能的局限性和有效性。发现EDIP和Tersoff(T3)的向外松弛方向与DFT和StillingerWeber(SW)方向(向内)相反,这限制了它们在结构特性计算中的应用。除了空位对称性,SW的结果与DFT的结果一致。因此,可以得出结论,SW应该是描述V_2和V_6的最佳潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号