...
首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >An Empirical Review of Research Methodologies and Methods in Creativity Studies (2003-2012)
【24h】

An Empirical Review of Research Methodologies and Methods in Creativity Studies (2003-2012)

机译:创造性研究的研究方法论和方法实证研究(2003-2012)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on the data collected from 5 prestigious creativity journals, research methodologies and methods of 612 empirical studies on creativity, published between 2003 and 2012, were reviewed and compared to those in gifted education. Major findings included: (a) Creativity research was predominantly quantitative and psychometrics and experiment were the most frequently utilized quantitative methodologies, (b) judges were employed frequently to assess creativity and correlational techniques were utilized most widely to analyze quantitative data, (c) case study was the most frequently used qualitative methodology, (d) most mixed-methods studies were rooted in quantitative methodology, and (e) both creativity and gifted education research were dominated by quantitative methodologies, but there were less qualitative studies and slightly more mixed-methods studies on creativity. Implications of these findings were further discussed and future research directions were suggested.
机译:根据从5个著名的创造力杂志收集的数据,回顾了2003年至2012年之间发表的612项关于创造力的实证研究的研究方法和方法,并将其与资优教育的方法进行了比较。主要发现包括:(a)创造力研究主要是量化和心理计量学,而实验是最常使用的量化方法;(b)法官经常被用来评估创造力,相关技术被最广泛地用来分析定量数据;(c)案例研究是最常用的定性方法,(d)大多数混合方法研究均以定量方法为基础,(e)创造力和资优教育研究均以定量方法为主,但定性研究较少,而混合研究则略多一些创造力的方法研究。进一步讨论了这些发现的含义,并提出了未来的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号