首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >Revisiting the 'Art Bias' in Lay Conceptions of Creativity
【24h】

Revisiting the 'Art Bias' in Lay Conceptions of Creativity

机译:再谈“创造力”概念中的“艺术偏见”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article explores the art bias - the pervasive association between creativity and art in implicit theories of creativity. It also attempts to connect creativity research in this area with literature on the theory of social representations. The data comes from an online survey completed by 195 participants mainly from the United States and the United Kingdom. The survey included two main tasks: The first asked respondents to generate as many questions as they can to determine whether an object is creative; the second invited them to rate whether creativity is a key requirement for a list of 16 professions from 4 different domains and recorded the creativity score as well as reaction time. In the end, findings offer partial support for the existence of an art bias. Although artistic professions were scored both the highest and fastest in terms of creativity, participants rarely formulated art-related questions and focused more on aspect, utility, and audience features. This discrepancy is discussed in the end in relation to the polyphasic nature of social knowledge.
机译:本文探讨艺术偏见-隐含的创造力理论中创造力与艺术之间的普遍联系。它还试图将这一领域的创造力研究与有关社会表征理论的文献联系起来。数据来自195位主要来自美国和英国的参与者完成的在线调查。该调查包括两个主要任务:第一,要求被调查者尽可能多地产生问题,以确定一个对象是否具有创造力;第二位邀请他们评估创造力是否是来自4个不同领域的16个职业列表的关键要求,并记录创造力得分以及反应时间。最后,发现为存在艺术偏见提供了部分支持。尽管就创造力而言,艺术专业的得分最高和最快,但参与者很少提出与艺术相关的问题,而更多地关注方面,效用和受众特征。最后,关于社会知识的多相性讨论了这种差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号