首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary drug problems >The political response to alcohol and drug advice in Australia: Comparing the response to two expert reports
【24h】

The political response to alcohol and drug advice in Australia: Comparing the response to two expert reports

机译:澳大利亚对酒精和毒品咨询的政治回应:将回应与两份专家报告进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The article examines the contents and policy response to two expert reports, one on drugs and one on alcohol, which were commissioned by the government of Victoria, Australia. The drug report was a wide-ranging response to what was seen as a crisis, but its main recommendations were not adopted. The recommendations were primarily in a highly contested policy area, but the lack of action may also have reflected a dramatic reduction in heroin overdose deaths shortly after the report appeared. The alcohol report was commissioned in a narrow frame of loosening liquor licensing restrictions to increase competition, defined as taking precedence over public health and order considerations. Its recommendations were quickly adopted, setting the stage for a political furor a decade later over alcohol-fueled violence. The lessons from the decade of experience after the reports are considered.
机译:本文考察了澳大利亚维多利亚州政府委托的两份专家报告的内容和政策对策,一份关于毒品,另一份关于酒精。毒品报告是对危机的广泛回应,但并未采纳其主要建议。这些建议主要是在竞争激烈的政策领域中提出的,但是缺乏行动可能也反映了报告出台后不久,海洛因过量死亡的人数急剧减少。酒精报告是在狭窄的框架内发布的,该框架放宽了酒类许可的限制,以增加竞争,这被定义为优先于公共卫生和秩序。它的建议很快被采纳,为十年后因酒精引发的暴力事件引发政治动荡奠定了基础。报告被考虑后,从十年的经验中吸取了教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号