首页> 外文期刊>Neuroscience Letters: An International Multidisciplinary Journal Devoted to the Rapid Publication of Basic Research in the Brain Sciences >Differential behavioral responses of the spontaneously hypertensive rat to methylphenidate and methamphetamine: lack of a rewarding effect of repeated methylphenidate treatment.
【24h】

Differential behavioral responses of the spontaneously hypertensive rat to methylphenidate and methamphetamine: lack of a rewarding effect of repeated methylphenidate treatment.

机译:自发性高血压大鼠对哌醋甲酯和甲基苯丙胺的差异行为反应:缺乏重复哌醋甲酯治疗的有益作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several questions remain unanswered concerning the effects of long-term methylphenidate treatment in individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It has been speculated that repeated methylphenidate treatment may facilitate abuse of the drug or psychological dependence. In the present study, we conducted conditioned place preference (CPP) tests to investigate whether the repeated treatment of methylphenidate results to greater "liking" of the drug. We compared the effect of methylphenidate with that of methamphetamine, a drug with high abuse and dependence liability; also used as a treatment of ADHD. Prior to CPP tests, adolescent spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) (putative rodent model of ADHD) and Wistar rats (strain used to represent the "normal" heterogeneous population) were administered intraperitoneally with methylphenidate (1.25, 5 and 20 mg/kg) or methamphetamine (1.25 and 5 mg/kg) for 14 days in their home cages. CPP tests were commenced and rats were conditioned with the two stimulants at the doses stated. We found that (1) repeated administration of methylphenidate and methamphetamine was rewarding in Wistar rats (2) stimulant-treated SHR showed CPP only to methamphetamine but not to methylphenidate. The observation that Wistar rats, but not SHR showed CPP to methylphenidate indicates vulnerability of "normal" individuals to methylphenidate abuse and dependence following repeated exposure or administration of the drug. The findings in SHR suggest the safety of methylphenidate as an ADHD intervention insofar as its behavioral effects are compared with those of methamphetamine, and to the extent that the SHR appropriately models ADHD in humans.
机译:关于长期服用哌醋甲酯对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者的影响,尚有几个问题尚未解答。据推测,重复哌醋甲酯治疗可能促进药物滥用或心理依赖。在本研究中,我们进行了条件位置偏爱(CPP)测试,以调查重复处理哌醋甲酯是否会导致药物的更大“喜好”。我们比较了哌醋甲酯和甲基苯丙胺的效果,甲基苯丙胺是一种具有高度滥用和依赖性的药物。也用作多动症的治疗。在进行CPP测试之前,对腹膜内给予哌醋甲酯(1.25、5和20 mg / kg)的青少年自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)(公认的ADHD啮齿动物模型)和Wistar大鼠(用于代表“正常”异类人群的菌株)或在其家中的笼子中服用甲基苯丙胺(1.25和5 mg / kg),持续14天。开始进行CPP测试,并按所述剂量用两种兴奋剂使大鼠适应。我们发现(1)在Wistar大鼠中重复给药哌醋甲酯和甲基苯丙胺是有益的(2)兴奋剂治疗的SHR显示CPP仅对甲基苯丙胺而不对哌醋甲酯。 Wistar大鼠但没有SHR观察到CPP对哌醋甲酯的观察结果表明,“正常”个体在反复暴露或给药后易受哌醋甲酯滥用和依赖性的影响。 SHR中的发现表明,哌醋甲酯作为行为干预措施与甲基苯丙胺相比具有安全性,并且在一定程度上可以合理地模拟人类的ADHD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号