...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Daily Sedation Interruption Versus Targeted Light Sedation Strategies in ICU Patients
【24h】

Daily Sedation Interruption Versus Targeted Light Sedation Strategies in ICU Patients

机译:重症监护病房患者每日镇静中断与有针对性的轻度镇静策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: The updated clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium recommend either daily sedation interruption or maintaining light levels of sedation as methods to improve outcomes for patients who are sedated in the ICU. We review the evidence supporting both methods and discuss whether one method is preferable or if they should be used concurrently.Data Source: Original research articles identified using the electronic PubMed database.Study Selection and Data Extraction: Randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies of mechanically ventilated ICU patients requiring sedation were selected. Data Synthesis: The methods of daily sedation interruption and targeting light sedation levels (including avoidance of deep sedation) are safe in critically ill patients with no increase, and a potential decrease, in long-term psychiatric disturbances. Randomized trials comparing these methods with standard care, which has traditionally involved moderate to heavy sedation, found that both methods reduced duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay.
机译:目的:针对疼痛,躁动和del妄进行管理的最新临床实践指南建议每天镇静镇静或保持轻度镇静水平,以改善在ICU镇静的患者的结局。我们审查支持这两种方法的证据,并讨论一种方法是否更可取或应同时使用。数据来源:使用PubMed电子数据库识别的原始研究论文。研究选择和数据提取:随机对照试验和大样本前瞻性队列研究选择需要镇静的机械通气ICU患者。数据综合:每日镇静方法和针对轻度镇静水平(包括避免深度镇静)的方法对于重症患者而言是安全的,长期精神病患者无增加,而潜在减少。将这些方法与传统上涉及中度至重度镇静的标准护理进行比较的随机试验发现,这两种方法均减少了机械通气时间和ICU住院时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号