首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Validity and reliability of The Johns Hopkins Adapted Cognitive Exam for critically ill patients.
【24h】

Validity and reliability of The Johns Hopkins Adapted Cognitive Exam for critically ill patients.

机译:约翰·霍普金斯适应症认知考试对重症患者的有效性和可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To validate The Johns Hopkins Adapted Cognitive Exam designed to assess and quantify cognition in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Neurosciences, surgical, and medical intensive care units at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred six adult critically ill patients. INTERVENTIONS: One expert neurologic assessment and four measurements of the Adapted Cognitive Exam (all patients). Four measurements of the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination in nonintubated patients only. Adapted Cognitive Exam and Mini-Mental State Examination were performed by 76 different raters. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred six patients were assessed, 46 intubated and 60 nonintubated, resulting in 424 Adapted Cognitive Exam and 240 Mini-Mental State Examination measurements. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing Adapted Cognitive Exam with a neurointensivist's assessment of cognitive status (rho = 0.83, p < .001). Ordinal logistic regression established optimal predicted cut points for cognitive status classification (/= 56 = mildly impaired or normal). Using these cut points, the Adapted Cognitive Exam appropriately classified cognitive status 90% of the time. Construct validity was assessed by comparing Adapted Cognitive Exam with Mini-Mental State Examination in nonintubated patients (rho = 0.81, p < .001). Face validity was assessed by surveying raters who used both the Adapted Cognitive Exam and Mini-Mental State Examination and indicated the Adapted Cognitive Exam was an accurate reflection of the patient's cognitive status, more sensitive a marker of cognition than the Mini-Mental State Examination, and easy to use. The Adapted Cognitive Exam demonstrated excellent interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.997; 95% confidence interval 0.997-0.998) and interitem reliability of each of the five subscales of the Adapted Cognitive Exam and Mini-Mental State Examination (Cronbach's alpha: range for Adapted Cognitive Exam = 0.83-0.88; range for Mini-Mental State Examination = 0.72-0.81). CONCLUSION: The Adapted Cognitive Exam is the first valid and reliable examination for the assessment and quantification of cognition in critically ill patients. It provides a useful, objective tool that can be used by any member of the interdisciplinary critical care team to support clinical assessment and research efforts.
机译:目的:验证旨在评估和量化重症患者认知的约翰霍普金斯适应性认知考试。设计:前瞻性队列研究。地点:约翰·霍普金斯医院的神经科学,外科和医疗重症监护室。患者:166名成人重症患者。干预措施:对适应性认知检查进行一次专家神经系统评估和四次测量(所有患者)。仅在非插管患者中进行四次Folstein轻度精神状态检查。由76位不同的评分者进行了适应性认知考试和小精神状态检查。测量和主要结果:评估了106例患者,进行了46例插管和60例未插管,进行了424项适应性认知检查和240项小脑状态检查。通过将适应性认知测验与神经强化学家对认知状态的评估进行比较来评估标准的有效性(rho = 0.83,p <.001)。有序逻辑回归确定了认知状态分类的最佳预测切入点( / = 56 =轻度受损或正常)。利用这些切入点,适应性认知测验可以在90%的时间对认知状态进行适当分类。通过比较非插管患者的适应性认知检查与小精神状态检查来评估构建体的有效性(rho = 0.81,p <.001)。面孔效度是由接受过适应性认知考试和小精神状态检查的评分者评估的,表明适应性考试是患者认知状态的准确反映,比小精神状态考试更敏感地识别了认知水平,且易于使用。适应性认知考试显示出出色的间质信度(类内相关系数= 0.997; 95%置信区间0.997-0.998)以及适应性认知考试和小心理状态考试的五个子量表(Cronbach's alpha:适应范围)认知考试= 0.83-0.88;小精神状态考试的范围= 0.72-0.81)。结论:适应性认知检查是重症患者认知评估和量化的第一个有效且可靠的检查。它提供了一个有用的,客观的工具,跨学科的重症监护小组的任何成员都可以使用它来支持临床评估和研究工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号