...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Inflammatory biomarkers and prediction for intensive care unit admission in severe community-acquired pneumonia.
【24h】

Inflammatory biomarkers and prediction for intensive care unit admission in severe community-acquired pneumonia.

机译:严重社区获得性肺炎的炎症生物标志物和重症监护病房入院的预测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Increased inflammatory response is related to severity and outcome in community-acquired pneumonia, but the role of inflammatory biomarkers in deciding intensive care unit admission is unknown. We assessed the relationship between inflammatory response, prediction for intensive care unit admission, delayed intensive care unit admission, and outcome in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Intensive care units of two university hospitals. PATIENTS: We included 627 ward and 58 intensive care unit patients with community-acquired pneumonia, 36 with direct and 22 with delayed intensive care unit admission. INTERVENTIONS: Serum levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-10 at admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed the prediction for intensive care unit admission of biomarkers and the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Procalcitonin (p=.001), C-reactive protein (p=.005), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p=.042), and interleukin-6 (p=.003) levels were higher in intensive care unit-admitted patients; however, the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines minor severity criteria predicted better intensive care unit admission (odds ratio, 12.03; 95% confidence interval, 5.13-28.20; p<.001). No patient with severe community-acquired pneumonia by three or more minor severity criteria and procalcitonin levels below the optimal cutoff (0.35 ng/mL) needed intensive care unit admission compared with 14 (23%) with levels above the cutoff (p=.032). In patients initially admitted to wards, procalcitonin (p=.012) and C-reactive protein (p=.039) were higher in those 22 patients subsequently transferred to the intensive care unit after adjusting for age, comorbidities, and Pneumonia Severity Index risk class. Despite initially admitted to wards, 14 (64%) patients with delayed intensive care unit admission had already criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia at admission compared with 73 (12%) ward patients (p<.001). CONCLUSION: Inflammatory biomarkers identified patients needing intensive care unit admission, including those with delayed intensive care unit admission. Patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia by minor criteria and low levels of procalcitonin may be safely admitted to wards. Correctly applying the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines would reduce substantially delayed intensive care unit admission.
机译:目的:炎性反应的增加与社区获得性肺炎的严重程度和预后有关,但尚不清楚炎性生物标志物在决定重症监护病房入院的作用。我们评估了社区获得性肺炎患者的炎症反应,重症监护病房入院预测,重症监护病房入院延迟以及预后之间的关系。设计:前瞻性临床研究。地点:两家大学医院的重症监护室。患者:我们纳入了627例病房和58例社区获得性肺炎重症监护病房,36例直接病房和22例重症监护病房延迟入院。干预措施:入院时血清C反应蛋白,降钙素原,肿瘤坏死因子-α,白介素-1,白介素-6,白介素8和白介素10的水平。测量和主要结果:我们评估了重症监护病房生物标志物的入院预测,并评估了美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会针对社区获得性肺炎的次要标准。重症监护病房允许的降钙素原(p = .001),C反应蛋白(p = .005),肿瘤坏死因子-α(p = .042)和白细胞介素6(p = .003)的水平更高耐心;但是,美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会的轻度严重程度标准预测重症监护病房的入院率会更高(赔率,12.03; 95%置信区间,5.13-28.20; p <.001)。没有三个或三个以上轻微严重程度标准的严重社区获得性肺炎且降钙素原水平低于最佳临界值(0.35 ng / mL)的患者不需要重症监护病房,而高于临界值的14例(23%)患者则需要重症监护病房(p = .032) )。在最初调整为病房的患者中,经过调整年龄,合并症和肺炎严重性指数风险后,降钙素原(p = .012)和C反应蛋白(p = .039)在随后转入重症监护病房的22例患者中较高。类。尽管最初入选病房,但有14名(64%)重症监护病房延迟入院的患者入院时已经有严重的社区获得性肺炎的标准,而病房患者为73名(12%)(p <.001)。结论:炎性生物标志物鉴定出需要重症监护病房入院的患者,包括那些延迟重症监护病房入院的患者。根据次要标准患有严重社区获得性肺炎且降钙素水平低的患者可以安全地进入病房。正确地应用美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会的指导方针,可减少重症监护病房入院的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号