...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in critically ill patients with delirium: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in critically ill patients with delirium: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

机译:喹硫平在重症del妄患者中的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性,多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of scheduled quetiapine to placebo for the treatment of delirium in critically ill patients requiring as-needed haloperidol. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Three academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Thirty-six adult intensive care unit patients with delirium (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist score > or = 4), tolerating enteral nutrition, and without a complicating neurologic condition. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive quetiapine 50 mg every 12 hrs or placebo. Quetiapine was increased every 24 hrs (50 to 100 to 150 to 200 mg every 12 hrs) if more than one dose of haloperidol was given in the previous 24 hrs. Study drug was continued until the intensive care unit team discontinued it because of delirium resolution, therapy > or = 10 days, or intensive care unit discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the quetiapine (n = 18) and placebo (n = 18) groups. Quetiapine was associated with a shorter time to first resolution of delirium [1.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.5-3.0) vs. 4.5 days (IQR, 2.0-7.0; p =.001)], a reduced duration of delirium [36 (IQR, 12-87) vs. 120 hrs (IQR, 60-195; p =.006)], and less agitation (Sedation-Agitation Scale score > or = 5) [6 (IQR, 0-38) vs. 36 hrs (IQR, 11-66; p =.02)]. Whereas mortality (11% quetiapine vs. 17%) and intensive care unit length of stay (16 quetiapine vs. 16 days) were similar, subjects treated with quetiapine were more likely to be discharged home or to rehabilitation (89% quetiapine vs. 56%; p =.06). Subjects treated with quetiapine required fewer days of as-needed haloperidol [3 [(IQR, 2-4)] vs. 4 days (IQR, 3-8; p = .05)]. Whereas the incidence of QTc prolongation and extrapyramidal symptoms was similar between groups, more somnolence was observed with quetiapine (22% vs. 11%; p = .66). CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine added to as-needed haloperidol results in faster delirium resolution, less agitation, and a greater rate of transfer to home or rehabilitation. Future studies should evaluate the effect of quetiapine on mortality, resource utilization, post-intensive care unit cognition, and dependency after discharge in a broader group of patients.
机译:目的:比较常规喹硫平与安慰剂治疗急需氟哌啶醇的危重患者of妄的疗效和安全性。设计:前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究。地点:三个学术医学中心。患者:adult妄的36名成人重症监护病房患者(重症监护Deli妄检查清单得分>或= 4),可耐受肠内营养,且无复杂的神经系统疾病。干预措施:患者每12小时随机接受喹硫平50 mg或安慰剂。如果在过去的24小时内服用超过一剂的氟哌啶醇,则每24小时增加一次喹硫平(每12小时50至100至150至200 mg)。继续研究药物,直到重症监护病房团队因resolution妄解决,治疗≥10天或重症监护病房出院而中止为止。测量和主要结果:喹硫平(n = 18)和安慰剂(n = 18)组的基线特征相似。奎硫平与first妄的首次解决时间较短[1.0(四分位间距[IQR],0.5-3.0)比4.5天(IQR,2.0-7.0; p = .001)]相关,,妄的持续时间减少[36 (IQR,12-87)vs. 120小时(IQR,60-195; p = .006)],以及较少的躁动(镇静-焦虑量表得分>或= 5)[6(IQR,0-38)vs。 36小时(IQR,11-66; p = .02)。死亡率(11%喹硫平vs. 17%)和重症监护病房住院时间(16喹硫平vs. 16天)相似,但接受喹硫平治疗的受试者更有可能出院或康复(89%喹硫平vs. 56 %; p = .06)。用喹硫平治疗的受试者所需的氟哌啶醇需要的天数更少[3 [(IQR,2-4)]比4天(IQR,3-8; p = .05)。各组之间QTc延长和锥体束外症状的发生率相似,但喹硫平观察到更多的嗜睡感(22%vs. 11%; p = .66)。结论:将喹硫平加到必要的氟哌啶醇中可导致更快的del妄消退,更少的躁动和更大的入院率或康复率。未来的研究应该评估喹硫平对更多患者的死亡率,资源利用,重症监护病房后认知以及出院后依存度的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号