...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Author response: Passing-Bablok regression is inappropriate for assessing association between structure and function
【24h】

Author response: Passing-Bablok regression is inappropriate for assessing association between structure and function

机译:作者回应:Passing-Bablok回归不适用于评估结构与功能之间的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We thank Marin-Franch1 for his comments on our recent paper.2 If some aspects of the statistical analysis were not as clear as they perhaps could have been, we are grateful for the opportunity to address them here. The first concern was that our conclusion was in conflict with previous findings.3,4 Hood et al.3 assumed that there is no relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual field sensitivity in healthy observers; this was not a finding, but a working assumption. This point was made in our paper. On the other hand, Wollstein et al.4 suggested that substantial structural loss must occur in the retina before functional damage can be detected using current testing methods; however, other published data support the notion that retinal structure and visual function are associated in healthy eyes.5,6
机译:我们感谢Marin-Franch1对我们最近的论文发表的评论。2如果统计分析的某些方面不够清晰,我们将非常高兴有机会在这里对此进行讨论。首先,我们的结论与先前的发现相矛盾。3,4Hood等人[3]认为,健康观察者的视网膜神经纤维层厚度与视野敏感性之间没有关系。这不是发现,而是可行的假设。这一点是在我们的论文中提出的。另一方面,Wollstein等人[4]提出,在使用当前的测试方法检测功能损害之前,视网膜必须发生实质性的结构性丧失。然而,其他已发表的数据也支持在健康的眼睛中视网膜结构和视觉功能相关的观点。5,6

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号