首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >DMPA and HIV: Do we need a trial?
【24h】

DMPA and HIV: Do we need a trial?

机译:DMPA和HIV:我们需要审判吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Whether hormonal contraceptive use increases the risk of HIV acquisition is still a much debated question. In countries that endure the double challenges of high HIV prevalence and high maternal mortality, the need for safe contraceptives is enormous, yet the meaning of "safe" becomes impossible to parse because of competing risks. Effective contraceptive use in these settings clearly and dramatically reduces maternal mortality. If women - or clinicians or health systems -avoid some contraceptives due to fear of HIV, will overall maternal deaths increase or decrease? The answer may vary by country and population subgroup, and thus general advice for public health policy is paralyzed. Thus far, our understanding of the increased risks comes from observational studies and secondary outcomes from trials designed to answer other questions. The quandary is whether DMPA users (and perhaps NET-EN users) have an increased risk of HIV acquisition and, if increased, by how much.
机译:使用激素避孕药是否会增加感染艾滋病毒的风险,仍然是一个备受争议的问题。在遭受艾滋病毒高发和高产妇死亡率双重挑战的国家,对安全避孕药具的需求巨大,但由于竞争风险,“安全”的含义变得无法解析。在这些情况下有效使用避孕药具可明显降低孕产妇死亡率。如果妇女-或临床医生或卫生系统-由于害怕感染艾滋病毒而避免使用某些避孕药具,那么整体孕产妇死亡人数会增加还是减少?答案可能因国家和人口亚组而异,因此公共卫生政策的一般建议被麻痹了。到目前为止,我们对风险增加的理解来自观察性研究以及旨在回答其他问题的试验的次要结果。难题是DMPA用户(也许还有NET-EN用户)是否有增加的HIV感染风险,如果增加的话,增加了多少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号