首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Pain control in first-trimester and second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a systematic review.
【24h】

Pain control in first-trimester and second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a systematic review.

机译:妊娠早期和中期妊娠止痛的控制:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Pain is a predictable feature of medical abortion in both the first trimester and the second trimester. We sought to evaluate optimal analgesia regimens during medical abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We searched the PubMed and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2010 for publications of trials comparing methods of pain control during first-trimester medical abortion (<12 completed weeks' gestation) and second-trimester medical abortion (13-24 completed weeks' gestation). Standard data abstraction templates were used to systematically assess and summarize data. RESULTS: Of 363 articles, 10 articles reporting the results of nine studies met inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity of analgesia regimens and medical abortion protocols prevented meta-analysis. Four studies conducted in women with pregnancies <8 completed weeks' gestation found that prophylactic acetaminophen, acetaminophen+codeine, ibuprofen or alverine did not reduce medical abortion pain; however, administration of ibuprofen after onset of cramping reduced pain and subsequent analgesia use. In second-trimester medical abortion, one study found that women treated with fentanyl (50 mcg) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) had better satisfaction and pain relief than women treated with fentanyl (25 mcg) or morphine PCA, but found no difference in delivery/demand ratio; three studies found little effect of adjuvant treatment with metoclopramide or paracervical block on pain; one study found that women at >15 weeks' gestation who received diclofenac with the first misoprostol dose required less opioid analgesia than women who received acetaminophen+codeine. CONCLUSION: Few studies examine pain management during medical abortion, and heterogeneity of existing data limits comparison. Further research is needed to determine the optimal analgesia regimens for first-trimester and second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy. To facilitate comparability of data, researchers should use contemporary medical abortion regimens, outcomes and study instruments to measure pain.
机译:背景:疼痛是妊娠中期和妊娠中期药物流产的可预测特征。我们试图评估药物流产期间的最佳镇痛方案。研究设计:从开始到2010年3月,我们在PubMed和Cochrane数据库中进行了搜索,以比较比较早孕药物流产(妊娠12周以下)和孕中期药物流产(13-24周完成)的疼痛控制方法的试验出版物(妊娠)。标准数据抽象模板用于系统地评估和汇总数据。结果:在363篇文章中,有10篇报道了9项研究的结果符合纳入标准。镇痛方案的异质性和药物流产方案阻止了荟萃分析。对怀孕少于8周的孕妇进行的四项研究发现,预防性对乙酰氨基酚,对乙酰氨基酚+可待因,布洛芬或白藜芦醇不能减轻药物流产的痛苦。然而,抽筋后发作布洛芬可减轻疼痛和随后的镇痛药使用。在妊娠中期药物流产中,一项研究发现,用芬太尼(50 mcg)患者自控镇痛(PCA)治疗的女性比接受芬太尼(25 mcg)或吗啡PCA的女性具有更好的满意度和缓解疼痛的效果,但发现交付/需求比率;三项研究发现甲氧氯普胺或宫颈旁阻滞对疼痛的辅助治疗效果不明显;一项研究发现,妊娠> 15周的妇女接受米索前列醇首剂双氯芬酸的镇静作用比接受对乙酰氨基酚+可待因的妇女减少了阿片类镇痛作用。结论:很少有研究检查药物流产时的疼痛处理,以及现有数据的异质性限制比较。需要进一步的研究来确定妊娠前三个月和妊娠中期医学终止的最佳镇痛方案。为了促进数据的可比性,研究人员应使用当代医学流产方案,结果和研究手段来测量疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号