首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis
【24h】

Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis

机译:氟康唑,伊曲康唑,泊沙康唑和伏立康唑在侵袭性真菌感染预防中的网络荟萃分析和药物经济学评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.
机译:侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)与高死亡率和巨大的经济负担相关。三唑预防用于血液系统恶性肿瘤或干细胞移植的高危患者。我们评估了预防三唑的功效和成本效益。对氟康唑,伊曲康唑胶囊和溶液,泊沙康唑和伏立康唑进行随机对照试验(RCT)的网络荟萃分析(NMA)。感兴趣的结果包括IFI的发生率和死亡人数。从患者的角度对一生的时间范围进行成本效益分析。健康状况之间转变的可能性来自NMA。资源使用和费用是从新加坡卫生保健机构获得的。纳入了21个RCT中的5,505名参与者的数据。除伊曲康唑胶囊外,所有三唑类抗真菌药均有效降低IFI。泊沙康唑优于氟康唑(赔率[OR],0.35 [95%置信区间[CI],0.16至0.73])和伊曲康唑胶囊(OR,0.25 [95%CI,0.06至0.97]),但优于伏立康唑(OR ,1.31 [95%CI,0.43 to 4.01])。与安慰剂,氟康唑和伊曲康唑溶液相比,泊沙康唑显着降低了全因死亡(OR,0.49至0.54 [95%CI,0.28至0.88])。对于移植患者,伊曲康唑溶液的增量成本-效果比低于泊沙康唑(避免了每IFI的新加坡元[SGD] 12,546对比SGD 26,817,节省的每个LY节省SGD 5,844 vs SGD 12,423)。对于白血病患者,伊曲康唑溶液是主要策略。伏立康唑以泊沙康唑为主。除伊曲康唑胶囊外,所有三唑类抗真菌药均可有效预防IFI。与氟康唑和伊曲康唑相比,泊沙康唑在减少IFI和全因死亡方面更有效。伊曲康唑溶液和泊沙康唑在新加坡医疗机构中均具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号