...
首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Retrospective Comparison of Posaconazole Levels in Patients Taking the Delayed-Release Tablet versus the Oral Suspension
【24h】

Retrospective Comparison of Posaconazole Levels in Patients Taking the Delayed-Release Tablet versus the Oral Suspension

机译:延迟释放片剂与口服混悬剂患者泊沙康唑水平的回顾性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While posaconazole prophylaxis decreases the risk of invasive fungal infection compared to fluconazole, low bioavailability of the oral-suspension formulation limits its efficacy. A new delayed-release tablet formulation demonstrated an improved pharmacokinetic profile in healthy volunteers. However, serum levels for the two formulations have not been compared in clinical practice. This study compared achievement of therapeutic posaconazole levels in patients taking the delayed-release tablet to those taking the oral suspension. This retrospective cohort study included 93 patients initiated on posaconazole between 2012 and 2014 and had at least one serum posaconazole level measured. The primary measure was the proportion of patients achieving an initial therapeutic level (>700 ng/ml). An initial therapeutic posaconazole level was seen in 29 of 32 (91%) patients receiving tablets and 37 of 61 (61%) patients receiving suspension (P = 0.003). Among patients with a steady-state level measured 5 to 14 days after initiation, a therapeutic level was observed in 18 of 20 (90%) patients receiving tablets and 25 of 43 (58%) patients receiving suspension (P = 0.01). In these patients, the median posaconazole level of the tablet cohort (1655 ng/ml) was twice that of the suspension cohort (798 ng/ml) (P = 0.004). In this cohort study, the improved bioavailability of delayed-release posaconazole tablets translates into a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving therapeutic serum levels than in the cohort receiving the oral suspension. The results of this study strongly support the use of delayed-release tablets over suspension in patients at risk for invasive fungal infection.
机译:尽管泊沙康唑的预防措施与氟康唑相比可降低侵袭性真菌感染的风险,但口服混悬剂的生物利用度低限制了其功效。新的缓释片剂配方在健康志愿者中显示出改善的药代动力学特征。但是,两种制剂的血清水平尚未在临床实践中进行比较。这项研究比较了服用缓释片剂的患者与口服混悬剂的泊沙康唑治疗水平的达成情况。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2012年至2014年间接受泊沙康唑治疗的93例患者,并至少测量了一种血清泊沙康唑水平。主要指标是达到初始治疗水平(> 700 ng / ml)的患者比例。接受片剂治疗的32名患者(91%)中有29名(61%)接受悬浮治疗的患者中有37名(61%)出现初始治疗性泊沙康唑水平(P = 0.003)。在开始后5到14天测量到稳态水平的患者中,接受片剂治疗的20位患者中有18位(90%)观察到治疗水平,接受悬浮液治疗的43位患者中有25位(58%)观察到治疗水平(P = 0.01)。在这些患者中,片剂组的泊沙康唑中位水平(1655 ng / ml)是悬浮液组的中位泊沙康唑水平(798 ng / ml)的两倍(P = 0.004)。在该队列研究中,延迟释放的泊沙康唑片的生物利用度提高了,与接受口服混悬液的队列相比,达到治疗性血清水平的患者比例要高得多。这项研究的结果有力地支持在有侵袭性真菌感染风险的患者中使用缓释片剂而不是混悬剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号