首页> 外文期刊>Analytical chemistry >High-Precision Tungsten Isotopic Analysis by Multicollection Negative Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry Based on Simultaneous Measurement of W and O-18/O-16 Isotope Ratios for Accurate Fractionation Correction
【24h】

High-Precision Tungsten Isotopic Analysis by Multicollection Negative Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry Based on Simultaneous Measurement of W and O-18/O-16 Isotope Ratios for Accurate Fractionation Correction

机译:基于同时测量W和O-18 / O-16同位素比的多次收集负热电离质谱法进行高精度钨同位素分析,以进行精确的分馏校正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Determination of the W-182/W-184 ratio to a precision of +/- 5 ppm (2 sigma) is desirable for constraining the timing of core formation and other early planetary differentiation processes. However, WO3- analysis by negative thermal ionization mass spectrometry normally results in a residual correlation between the instrumental-mass-fractionation-corrected (182)w/(184)w and W-183/W-184 ratios that is attributed to mass-dependent variability of 0 isotopes over the course of an analysis and between different analyses. A second-order correction using the W-183/W-184 ratio relies on the assumption that this ratio is constant in nature. This may prove invalid, as has already been realized for other isotope systems. The present study utilizes simultaneous monitoring of the O-18/O-16 and W isotope ratios to correct oxide interferences on a per-integration basis and thus avoid the need for a double normalization of W isotopes. After normalization of W isotope ratios to a pair of W isotopes, following the exponential law, no residual W-O isotope correlation is observed. However, there is a nonideal mass bias residual correlation between W-182/W-i and W-183/W-i with time. Without double normalization of W isotopes and on the basis of three or four duplicate analyses, the external reproducibility per session of W-182/W-184 and W-183/W-184 normalized to W-186/W-183 is 5-6 ppm (2 sigma, 1-3 mu g loads). The combined uncertainty per session is less than 4 ppm for 183W/184W and less than 6 ppm for 182W/184W (2 sigma(m)) for loads between 3000 and 50 ng.
机译:确定W-182 / W-184比率至+/- 5 ppm(2 sigma)的精度对于限制岩心形成和其他早期行星分化过程的时间是理想的。但是,通过负热电离质谱法进行的WO3-分析通常会导致仪器质量分数校正后的(182)w /(184)w和W-183 / W-184比率之间存在残留相关性,这归因于质量在分析过程中以及不同分析之间0同位素的相关变异性。使用W-183 / W-184比率的二阶校正依赖于该比率本质上是恒定的假设。正如其他同位素系统已经意识到的那样,这可能被证明是无效的。本研究利用对O-18 / O-16和W同位素比率的同时监测来校正每个积分的氧化物干扰,从而避免了对W同位素的双重归一化的需要。在将W同位素比标准化为一对W同位素后,遵循指数规律,未观察到任何残留的W-O同位素相关性。但是,W-182 / W-i和W-183 / W-i之间随时间存在一个不理想的质量偏差残余相关性。如果不对W同位素进行双重归一化,并且基于三或四次重复分析,则归一化为W-186 / W-183的W-182 / W-184和W-183 / W-184每次会话的外部重现性为5 6 ppm(2 sigma,1-3克负载)。对于3000W至50 ng的负载,每次会话的总不确定度对于183W / 184W小于4 ppm,对于182W / 184W(2 sigma(m))小于6 ppm。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号