...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Differential effect of central command on aortic and carotid sinus baroreceptor-heart rate reflexes at the onset of spontaneous, fictive motor activity
【24h】

Differential effect of central command on aortic and carotid sinus baroreceptor-heart rate reflexes at the onset of spontaneous, fictive motor activity

机译:自发性,虚拟运动开始时中枢指挥对主动脉和颈窦窦压力感受器-心率反射的差异作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our laboratory has reported that central command blunts the sensitivity of the aortic baroreceptor-heart rate (HR) reflex at the onset of voluntary static exercise in conscious cats and spontaneous contraction in decerebrate cats. The purpose of this study was to examine whether central command attenuates the sensitivity of the carotid sinus barorecep-tor-HR reflex at the onset of spontaneous, fictive motor activity in paralyzed, decerebrate cats. We confirmed that aortic nerve (AN)-stimulation-induced bradycardia was markedly blunted to 26 +- 4.4% of the control (21 +- 1.3 beats/min) at the onset of spontaneous motor activity. Although the baroreflex bradycardia by electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus nerve (CSN) was suppressed (P < 0.05) to 86 +-5.6% of the control (38 +- 1.2 beats/min), the inhibitory effect of spontaneous motor activity was much weaker (P < 0.05) with CSN stimulation than with AN stimulation. The baroreflex bradycardia elicited by brief occlusion of the abdominal aorta was blunted to 36% of the control (36 +-1.6 beats/min) during spontaneous motor activity, suggesting that central command is able to inhibit the cardiomotor sensitivity of arterial baroreflexes as the net effect. Mechanical stretch of the triceps surae muscle never affected the baroreflex bradycardia elicited by AN or CSN stimulation and by aortic occlusion, suggesting that muscle mechanoreflex did not modify the cardiomotor sensitivity of aortic and carotid sinus baroreflex. Since the inhibitory effect of central command on the carotid baroreflex pathway, associated with spontaneous motor activity, was much weaker compared with the aortic baroreflex pathway, it is concluded that central command does not force a generalized modulation on the whole pathways of arterial baroreflexes but provides selective inhibition for the cardiomotor component of the aortic baroreflex.
机译:我们的实验室报告说,在有意识的猫进行自愿静态锻炼和在无脑的猫中自发收缩时,中央指挥部会减弱主动脉压力感受器心率(HR)反射的敏感性。这项研究的目的是检查在瘫痪的,无脑的猫中,自发的,虚构的运动活动开始时,中枢命令是否会减弱颈动脉窦压力感受器-HR反射的敏感性。我们确认,自发运动开始时,主动脉(AN)刺激引起的心动过缓明显减弱至对照组的26±4.4%(21±1.3次/分钟)。尽管通过电刺激颈动脉窦神经(CSN)产生的压力反射性心动过缓被抑制(P <0.05)至对照组的86 + -5.6%(38 +-1.2次/分钟),但自发运动活动的抑制作用却很大CSN刺激比AN刺激更弱(P <0.05)。在自发运动过程中,腹主动脉短暂闭塞引起的压力反射性心动过缓被减弱至对照组的36%(36 + -1.6次/分钟),这表明中央指令能够抑制动脉压力反射的心脏运动敏感性影响。肱三头肌的机械拉伸从未影响过AN或CSN刺激以及主动脉闭塞所引起的压力感受性心动过缓,这表明肌肉的机械反射性并未改变主动脉和颈动脉窦压力感受性反射的心动敏感性。由于与主动脉压力反射通路相比,中枢指令对颈动脉压力反射通路的抑制作用弱于自发运动,因此可以得出结论,中枢指令不会对动脉压力反射的整个通路施加普遍的调节作用,但可以提供选择性抑制主动脉压力反射的心脏运动成分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号