首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >A comparison of Gardenia augusta cultivars using isozymes and RAPD markers.
【24h】

A comparison of Gardenia augusta cultivars using isozymes and RAPD markers.

机译:使用同工酶和RAPD标记比较of子花品种的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Numerous cultivars of the florist gardenia [Gardenia augusta (L) Merrill.=G. jasminoides J. Ellis] exist but there is confusion over naming as a result of different sources that apply different names to their materials. Two studies were conducted with (some) of the same plant materials to determine whether clear distinctions could be made. Comparisons were also made to other Gardenia species available to us. The isozyme study compared polymorphisms in seven enzyme systems in buffered leaf extracts using starch gel electrophoresis. Total genomic DNA was extracted recently matured leaves using the DNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) extraction protocol. Nine random 10-mer RAPD primers (Operon Technologies, Alameda, CA, USA) were selected for analyses. Gels were digitally imaged and analyzed to compile a presence/absence matrix. For the isozyme study, phosphoglucomutase (PGM), phos-phoglucoisomerase (PGI), and uridine diphosphoglucopyrophosphorylase(UDPP) were the only successful enzyme systems to yield clear interpretations for a total of 5 loci, and dendrograms based on Jaccard's or simple matching coefficients of similarity were very comparable. However, the three enzyme systems were not sufficient to uniquely fingerprint all of the G. augusta accessions. The RAPD analysis using the nine 10-mer primers showed well-defined (bootstrap values >80) groups: the G. augusta, with subgroupings and the G. brighamii and species. Both isozyme and RAPD analyses separated or matched cultivars of G. augusta as well as G. brighamii and other Gardenia species. Coupled with leaf and floral measurements and morphological descriptions, it is possible to distinguish among commercial florist gardenias in a decisive manner.
机译:花店garden子的许多品种[Gardenia augusta(L)Merrill。= G。尽管存在[jasminoides J. Ellis],但由于使用不同名称在其材料上使用不同名称的结果,在命名方面存在混淆。对(某些)相同植物材料进行了两项研究,以确定是否可以进行明显区分。我们还与其他可用的Garden子物种进行了比较。同工酶研究使用淀粉凝胶电泳比较了缓冲叶提取物中七个酶系统中的多态性。使用DNeasy Mini Kit(QIAGEN,Inc.,Valencia,CA,USA)提取方案提取最近成熟的叶片的总基因组DNA。选择了九种随机的10-mer RAPD引物(Operon Technologies,阿拉米达,加利福尼亚,美国)进行分析。对凝胶进行数字成像和分析,以编译存在/不存在的矩阵。对于同工酶研究,磷酸葡萄糖变位酶(PGM),磷酸磷酸葡萄糖异构酶(PGI)和尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸磷酸化酶(UDPP)是唯一成功的酶系统,能够对总共5个基因座和树状图做出清晰的解释,这些图谱基于Jaccard或简单匹配系数相似性非常可比。但是,这三种酶系统不足以唯一地指纹识别所有G. augusta保藏号。使用九种10-mer引物进行的RAPD分析显示了明确定义的(引导值> 80)组:奥古斯塔菌(G. augusta),具有亚组以及Brighamii和种。同工酶和RAPD分析都可以分离或匹配G. augusta以及G. brighamii和其他Garden子的品种。结合叶和花的测量值以及形态学描述,可以以决定性的方式区分商业花店garden子花。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号