首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral sciences & the law >Young Children's Difficulty with Indirect Speech Acts: Implications for Questioning Child Witnesses
【24h】

Young Children's Difficulty with Indirect Speech Acts: Implications for Questioning Child Witnesses

机译:幼儿的间接言语行为困难:对儿童证人的质疑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Prior research suggests that infelicitous choice of questions can significantly underestimate children's actual abilities, independently of suggestiveness. One possibly difficult question type is indirect speech acts such as Do you know... questions (DYK, e.g., Do you know where it happened?). These questions directly ask if respondents know, while indirectly asking what respondents know. If respondents answer yes, but fail to elaborate, they are either ignoring or failing to recognize the indirect question (known as pragmatic failure). Two studies examined the effect of indirect speech acts on maltreated and non-maltreated 2- to 7-year-olds' post-event interview responses. Children were read a story and later interviewed using DYK and Wh- questions. Additionally, children completed a series of executive functioning tasks. Both studies revealed that using DYK questions increased the chances of pragmatic failure, particularly for younger children and those with lower inhibitory control skills. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:先前的研究表明,不加选择地选择问题可能会严重低估儿童的实际能力,而与暗示性无关。一种可能困难的问题类型是间接言语行为,例如您是否知道...问题(例如,DYK,例如,您知道它发生在哪里吗?)。这些问题直接询问受访者是否知道,而间接询问受访者知道什么。如果受访者回答“是”,但未能详细说明,他们要么无视,要么不认识间接问题(称为实用性失败)。两项研究检查了间接言语行为对受虐待和未受虐待的2至7岁儿童事后访谈反应的影响。给孩子们读一个故事,然后用DYK和Wh-问题进行访谈。此外,孩子们还完成了一系列执行功能任务。两项研究都表明,使用DYK问题会增加实际失败的机会,特别是对于年幼的孩子和抑制控制技能较低的孩子。版权所有(c)2014 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号