首页> 外文期刊>Blood: The Journal of the American Society of Hematology >Randomized phase 2 study: elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM
【24h】

Randomized phase 2 study: elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM

机译:随机2期研究:依洛珠单抗联合硼替佐米/地塞米松与硼替佐米/地塞米松治疗复发/难治性MM

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this proof-of-concept, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) received elotuzumab with bortezomib and dexamethasone (EBd) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (Bd) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary/exploratory endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Two-sided 0.30 significance level was specified (80% power, 103 events) to detect hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on all randomized patients and all treated patients, respectively. Of 152 randomized patients (77 EBd, 75 Bd), 150 were treated (75 EBd, 75 Bd). PFSwasgreater with EBd vs Bd (HR, 0.72; 70% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.88; stratified log-rank P = .09); median PFS was longer with EBd (9.7 months) vs Bd (6.9 months). In an updated analysis, EBd-treated patients homozygous for the high-affinity Fc gamma RIIIa allele had median PFS of 22.3 months vs 9.8 months in EBd-treated patients homozygous for the low-affinity allele. ORR was 66% (EBd) vs 63% (Bd). Very good partial response or better occurred in 36% of patients (EBd) vs 27% (Bd). Early OS results, based on 40 deaths, revealed an HR of 0.61 (70% CI, 0.43-0.85). To date, 60 deaths have occurred (28 EBd, 32 Bd). No additional clinically significant adverse events occurred with EBd vs Bd. Grade 1/2 infusion reaction rate was low (5% EBd) and mitigated with premedication. In patients with RRMM, elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory antibody, appears to provide clinical benefit without added clinically significant toxicity when combined with Bd vs Bd alone. Registered to ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01478048.
机译:在这项概念验证的,开放标签的2期研究中,患有复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)的患者接受了厄洛珠单抗联合硼替佐米和地塞米松(EBd)或硼替佐米和地塞米松(Bd),直到疾病进展/无法接受的毒性。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS);次要/探索性终点指标包括总体缓解率(ORR)和总体生存率(OS)。指定了双向0.30显着性水平(80%功效,103个事件),以检测危险比(HR)为0.69。分别对所有随机分组的患者和所有接受治疗的患者进行了疗效和安全性分析。在152名随机患者(77 EBd,75 Bd)中,有150名接受了治疗(75 EBd,75 Bd)。 PFS较EBd和Bd更好(HR,0.72; 70%置信区间[CI],0.59-0.88;分层对数秩P = .09); EBd(9.7个月)比Bd(6.9个月)的中位PFS更长。在更新的分析中,高亲和力FcγRIIIa等位基因纯合的EBd治疗患者的PFS中位数为22.3个月,而低亲和力等位基因纯合的EBd治疗患者为9.8个月。 ORR为66%(EBd),而63%(Bd)。 36%(EBd)的患者有很好的局部反应或好转,而27%(Bd)的患者有更好的反应。基于40例死亡的早期OS结果显示,HR为0.61(70%CI,0.43-0.85)。迄今为止,已有60人死亡(28 EBd,32 Bd)。 EBd vs Bd没有发生其他临床上显着的不良事件。 1/2级输注反应率低(5%EBd),并通过用药缓解。在RRMM患者中,与单独的Bd相比,Elotuzumab(一种免疫刺激性抗体)似乎在不增加临床显着毒性的情况下提供了临床益处。注册为ClinicalCTals.gov的NCT01478048。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号