首页> 外文期刊>Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases >Comparison of three real-time PCR methods with blood smears and rapid diagnostic test in Plasmodium sp. infection.
【24h】

Comparison of three real-time PCR methods with blood smears and rapid diagnostic test in Plasmodium sp. infection.

机译:三种实时荧光定量PCR方法与血涂片的比较和疟原虫sp。的快速诊断测试感染。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In cases of malaria, rapid and accurate diagnosis of Plasmodium sp. is essential. In this study three different quantitative, real-time PCR methods were compared with routine methods used for malaria diagnosis. A comparative study was conducted prospectively in the laboratories of Montpellier and Nimes University Hospitals. The methods used for routine diagnostic malaria testing consisted of microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood smears and rapid diagnostic tests. Three quantitative real-time PCR methods (qRT-PCR) were tested: qRT-PCR1 amplified a specific sequence on the P. falciparum Cox1 gene, qRT-PCR2 amplified a species-specific region of the multicopy 18S rDNA, and qRT-PCR3 amplified a mitochondrial DNA sequence. Among the 196 blood samples collected, 73 samples were positive in at least one of the five tests. Compared with the routine method, there were no false negatives for P. falciparum diagnosis in either qRT-PCR1 or qRT-PCR3. In all P. ovale, P. vivax and P. malariae infections diagnosed from blood smears, qRT-PCR1 was negative, as expected, whereas qRT-PCR2 and qRT-PCR3 were positive and concordant (simple kappa coefficient = 1). One negative sample from microscopy was positive with both qRT-PCR2 and qRT-PCR3. Together, qRT-PCR3 and the combined qRT-PCR1 and qRT-PCR2 were concordant with routine methods for malaria diagnosis (99% and 99.5%, respectively). These three rapid, molecular qRT-PCR methods, used alone or in association, showed excellent results, with high concordance, accuracy and reliability in malaria diagnosis.
机译:如果是疟疾,可以快速准确地诊断出疟原虫。是必不可少的。在这项研究中,将三种不同的定量实时PCR方法与用于疟疾诊断的常规方法进行了比较。在蒙彼利埃和尼姆斯大学医院的实验室中进行了前瞻性比较研究。用于常规诊断性疟疾测试的方法包括显微镜检查吉姆萨染色的血液涂片和快速诊断测试。测试了三种定量实时PCR方法(qRT-PCR):qRT-PCR1扩增了恶性疟原虫Cox1基因上的特定序列,qRT-PCR2扩增了多拷贝18S rDNA的物种特异性区域,qRT-PCR3扩增了线粒体DNA序列。在收集的196份血液样本中,至少有五项检测中有73份样本呈阳性。与常规方法相比,在qRT-PCR1或qRT-PCR3中没有恶性疟原虫诊断的假阴性。在所有通过血液涂片诊断出的椭圆形疟原虫,间日疟原虫和疟疾疟原虫感染中,qRT-PCR1均为阴性,如预期的那样,而qRT-PCR2和qRT-PCR3为阳性且一致(简单κ系数= 1)。来自显微镜的一个阴性样品在qRT-PCR2和qRT-PCR3上均为阳性。在一起,qRT-PCR3以及组合的qRT-PCR1和qRT-PCR2与常规的疟疾诊断方法(分别为99%和99.5%)一致。单独使用或结合使用的这三种快速的分子qRT-PCR方法均显示出优异的结果,在疟疾诊断中具有高度的一致性,准确性和可靠性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号