首页> 外文期刊>Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases >Comparison of the new InoDiag automated fluorescence multiplexed antigen microarray to the reference technique in the serodiagnosis of atypical bacterial pneumonia.
【24h】

Comparison of the new InoDiag automated fluorescence multiplexed antigen microarray to the reference technique in the serodiagnosis of atypical bacterial pneumonia.

机译:新型InoDiag自动化荧光多重抗原微阵列与非典型细菌性肺炎血清诊断参考技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aetiological diagnosis of pneumonia depends largely on culture-, antigen- or PCR-based tests. Atypical agents of pneumonia include Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Francisella tularensis and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. In these cases, serological tests are commonly used for diagnosis. All of the above species were comparatively screened for by using the InoDiag multiplexed automatic immunofluorescence assay and established reference techniques. The InoDiag assay required 5 microL of serum, took 76 min per serum sample, and required an incubator, a fluorescence reader and interpretation software. In total, 248 single sera from patients were tested, for the diagnosis of pneumonia, and the results obtained with selected serum samples were compared with results obtained with the reference method. It was shown that, for the detection of Coxiella burnetii IgM, the automated assay had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. For the detection of M. pneumoniae IgM, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 98%. For the detection of Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Chlamydia psittaci IgG, sensitivity was 81% and specificity was 94%. For the detection of L. pneumoniae IgG, sensitivity was 63% and specificity was 98%. For the detection of F. tularensis IgG and IgM, sensitivity was 100% for both, and specificity was 95% and 100%, respectively. The performance of this serological assay was comparable to that of other assays reported in the literature. This preliminary study shows that the automatic InoDiag assay opens the way to immunofluorescence assay standardization.
机译:肺炎的病因诊断很大程度上取决于基于培养物,抗原或PCR的检测。肺炎的非典型药包括伯氏柯氏杆菌,肺炎衣原体,鹦鹉热衣原体,肺炎军团菌,土拉弗朗西斯菌和肺炎支原体。在这些情况下,血清学检查通常用于诊断。通过使用InoDiag多重自动免疫荧光测定法和已建立的参考技术对上述所有物种进行了比较筛选。 InoDiag分析需要5微升血清,每个血清样品需要76分钟,并且需要培养箱,荧光读取器和解释软件。总共测试了248例来自患者的单一血清,以诊断肺炎,并将选择的血清样本获得的结果与参考方法获得的结果进行了比较。结果显示,对于检测柯氏杆菌IgM,自动测定的灵敏度和特异性为100%。对于肺炎支原体IgM的检测,灵敏度为100%,特异性为98%。对于肺炎衣原体和鹦鹉热衣原体IgG的检测,灵敏度为81%,特异性为94%。对于肺炎链球菌IgG的检测,灵敏度为63%,特异性为98%。对于T. tularensis IgG和IgM的检测,两者的灵敏度均为100%,特异性分别为95%和100%。该血清学测定的性能可与文献中报道的其他测定相媲美。这项初步研究表明,自动的InoDiag测定法为免疫荧光测定法的标准化开辟了道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号